Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IrishBrigade

1. There were 8 times as many anti-slavery associations in the south than the north.

2. Outlawing slavery was already being widely discussed in state legislatures.

3. Only 3% of white southerners owned slaves. They were really expensive (young male was around $100,000 in todays money) so only the rich could afford them. One of the flash points was slavery but the main issue was state’s rights. The 97% who didn’t own slaves did not fight for rich people to own slaves - not by a long shot. They fought for states rights.

Slave owner does not = ‘southerner’. It is important that you disabuse yourself of that notion.


32 posted on 08/18/2017 7:22:35 PM PDT by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: TheTimeOfMan
Slave owner does not = ‘southerner’. It is important that you disabuse yourself of that notion.

Then what % were Northerners?

33 posted on 08/18/2017 8:36:42 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson