Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla
"I wonder if someone, or a group, promped the SA that he/she/they would make up any fall off in donations..."

A second thought: maybe some corporate donors threatened to shut them off if they didn't pull out of the Mar a Lago event. On the other hand, I wouldn't think that the salvation Army would be a particularly sexy charity for leftist corporations to support in the first place.

A third thought: why is the Salvation Army even having events at a ritzy locale like Mar a Lago in the first place? Seems kind of extravagant for a charity devoted to the poor.
72 posted on 08/18/2017 2:43:02 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

I’d say it would depend on how much money was going for overhead. If not a lot, then I don’t have a problem with ritzy fundraisers. What can I say, the rich are different.

Samaritan’s Purse does fine work. I hope folks who aren’t familiar will take a look there.


86 posted on 08/18/2017 4:18:43 PM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson