https://www.infowars.com/video-peaceful-alt-left-protesters-attack-cops-following-trump-rally/
Mr. Pepperballs has made a vid from ER. LOL!!!
Conservatives need to be certain to assign the Nazis to the left, where they came from.
It doesn’t matter that Nazis want to associate with the right.
“Antifa Extreme”
Antifa uses violence to intimidate people with political views that they dislike. “Extreme” is too mild; they’re terrorists.
Is the Trump BA alarm buzzer Buzzing?
NPR did a piece explaining away Antifa violence while trying to potray anyone not left as a racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, white supremacist.
The socialist-democrats are employing a classic alinsky tactic.
They’re trying to isolate, villify, demonize, and de-humanize anyone who is conservative, voted for Trump, who lives in “flyover” country, and believes in the rule of law and the Constitution.
Attacking and antagonizing 60 million+ people in one country is not a very good idea.
At this point domestic terrorists Antifa could commit murder in broad daylight and the media would excuse it as long as the victim was on the ideological side they dislike.
Peace through Violence
Charlottesville Virginia erupted in riots on Saturday August 12, 2017 which was characterized by our media as alt left and alt right spontaneously erupting over some monument in Charlottesville, VA.
Subsequent discussion reveals there was nothing spontaneous about this horrific event.
A video clip making the rounds mentioned an EYE WITNESS to KKK/NAZI/ANTIFA/BLM ARRIVING ON SAME BUSES in Charlotte that day .
After locating the video channel, sure enough, the young man followed up on his claim having access to this eyewitness. His follow-up video-chat interview of approximately 40 minutes length follows below along with a rough transcript
Freepers owe it to themselves to read this article twice.
Russia-Trump is indeed dead. Destroyed by the technical facts finally coming out and the Assange Threat.
So on we go to Lying Racist Natzi Trump. And Charlottesville was the first major project in this Dem/MSM Narrative of Day initiative. That project went even better than was expected when a Bad Hoodlum killed a “Good Hoodlum”.
Good Hoodlum! What’s that?
It’s Antifa and the MSM is now on the hook for completing an impossible task: Convincing the American public that Antifa is not just another Soros funded bunch of Marxist Hoodlums.
This task is going to get harder and harder as the Body Count of Antifa victims continue to grow.
Trust me. This Dem/MSM/Antifa/Soros Project will fail.
"... is justifying violent action [emphasis added] in the streets to beat back racists and neo-Nazis."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Regarding the so-called justification of violent action, patriots are reminded the following about the 1st Amendment. That amendment doesn't guarantee the “absolute right to assemble.” That amendment guarantees the right only to peaceably assemble.
"1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably [emphasis added] to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
What’s going on with violent uprisings is the states is the following imo.
Shown below is the Constitution’s Article IV, Section 4 (4.4) and Justice Joseph Story’s explanation for Section 4. Note that 4.4 can be though of as a federal "911" for the states to use to request military assistance to help suppress domestic uprisings that could weaken the USA.
"Article I, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence [emphasis added]."
”§ 1808. The want of a provison of this nature was felt, as a capital defect in the plan of the confederation, as it might in its consequences endanger, if not overthrow, the Union. Without a guaranty, the assistance to be derived from the national government in repelling domestic dangers, which might threaten the existence of the state constitutions, could not be demanded, as a right, from the national government. Usurpation might raise its standard, and trample upon the liberties of the people, while the national government could legally do nothing more, than behold the encroachments with indignation and regret. A successful faction might erect a tyranny on the ruins of order and law; while no succour could be constitutionally afforded by the Union to the friends and supporters of the government. But this is not all. The destruction of the national government itself, or of neighbouring states, might result from a successful rebellion in a single state. Who can determine, what would have been the issue, if the insurrection in Massachusetts, in 1787, had been successful, and the malecontents had been headed by a Caesar or a Cromwell? [emphasis added] If a despotic or monarchical government were established in one state, it would bring on the ruin of the whole republic. Montesquieu has acutely remarked, that confederated governments should be formed only between states, whose form of government is not only similar, but also republican.” —Justice Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 3, 1833.
H O W E V E R …
Since local, state and federal government's are seemingly ignoring violent assemblies that are arguably not protected by the 1st Amendment, I suspect that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress is working in cahoots with the corrupt media and likewise corrupt state and local governments to ignore 4.4 (alleged: Who gave Charlottesville police the stand down order?), the federal "911" number, in order to promote uprisings to destabilize the USA.
Drain the swamp sewer! Drain the sewer!
Remember in November 2018 !
Since corrupt Congress is the biggest part of the sewer (imo) that Trump wants to drain, it is actually up to patriots to drain the sewer in the 2018 elections, patriots supporting Trump by electing as many new members of Congress as they can who will support Trump.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the primary ballots.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to make sure that candidates are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed here.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also, unlike incumbent members of Congress who wrongly remained silent while misguided state officials abridged the constitutionally enumerated rights of citizens during the lawless Obama Administration, patriots need to make sure that candidates on the 2018 primary ballots commit to the following.
Candidates need to commit to making and enforcing 14th Amendment-related laws to prosecute misguided state officials who use state powers to abridge constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment-protected religious expression and free speech for example, such actions prohibited by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
”14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Again, drain the sewer! Drain the sewer!