[[The red is what the data from these same stations shows after the climate fraudsters at NOAA have “adjusted” it. ]]
I believe it was NOAA that claimed one of the temperature satellites had ‘veered off course’ *(after it was discovered that the satellites showed no warming for nearly 20 years)* and they ‘readjusted’ the readings to ‘reflect the course change’ that ‘affected the readings’
in other words- they INVENTED new temperature readings out of thin air and whattayaknow- there was now warming in those 20 years-
Predictably, far more of the "adjusted" data shows warming than cooling.
However - if the "raw" data is examined - there are vast swathes of the globe, the Pacific, Atlantic, Africa, and Asia, where no data whatsoever is collected. Makes sense, the world is a big place. BUT - if you overlay the "raw" and "adjusted" maps, these vast, unmonitored tracts of land, all show "warming". Even though there's not a single point of data to support it.
I'm not talking about some guy in the Arctic fudging readings on a thermometer. This is 50% - or more - of the globe where "scientists" have no idea what the surface temp is, but are completely OK with taking a swing at it. And, I'm sure that the fact that their guess supports their hypothesis is just a coincidence.
The links that I had to the maps at the NOAA are dead. I'll poke around online and see what I can find. The internet keeps everything.