Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

Giving a temporary property tax abatement to builders of new commercial buildings is a longstanding method of encouraging commercial development. It is, I think, appropriate, as opposed to direct subsidies.


5 posted on 08/24/2017 2:35:19 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: iowamark

Tax bribes have not worked in NYS.


11 posted on 08/24/2017 2:59:01 PM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

And its not as if those companies that benefit from property tax incentives don’t pay property taxes - indeed they do, they just get a discounted rate. A 2000 acre property with two data centers will still bring in new and much-appreciated property tax revenues for that county. Add in at least 50 permanent jobs, plus the income taxes paid, and additional $$$ then pumped into the local economy (not to mention the short-term job boost from construction).

Also - common citizens will have a side-benefit of improved tech infrastructure from another major tech player that will require MASSIVE backbone support for bandwidth use.

And while Apple may be a mostly “liberal”-leaning company (as are, sadly, most tech companies), they tend to be awfully generous to local causes and municipalities - notice the promised local investments, even before the deal’s ink is dry - a ball park and $100 million in to a local developments fund. Seems Apple is already planning to pay back the incentive $ (and yes, they can take a tax write-off for a lot of that).


100 posted on 09/01/2017 11:43:36 AM PDT by TheBattman (Gun control works - just ask Chicago...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson