Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

The 214 boats with AIP may have advantages in ASW over the nuclear boats. And you can build a lot more for your money. Unless ROK plans to project power, the 214s are a better bet.


3 posted on 09/04/2017 11:35:08 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35

The AIPs are quieter. SK doesn’t need far-ranging nuclear subs. Sounds like SK is copying our very own military-industrial complex. Expensive unnecessary toys.


12 posted on 09/04/2017 12:27:41 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35
And you can build a lot more for your money. Unless ROK plans to project power, the 214s are a better bet.

True, but there are other considerations.

If you build more boats you have to man them. More men, more training, more space at the docks for berthing them.

And how many boats do you need? ROK on needs enough boats to keep an eye on NRK’s boats.

If ROK fields too many boats in a limited patrol area they increase the chances of collision with shipping traffic or other boats.

One Nuke boat may be able to do more than two diesel boats with fewer men more safely considering the size of the territory to be patrolled.

It is not an easily made decision.

14 posted on 09/04/2017 1:00:15 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson