It is incumbent on you to do the research to show other wise.
The original work has been duplicated many times, so they don't really care if an anonymous guy called Cletus understands or agrees
:: It is incumbent on you to do the research to show other wise. ::
No. it is not - you clearly give the liberal/communist position. Your statement above is EXACTLY why liberal journalists say such things. They don’t provide truth behind their conclusive statements, they simply expect the reader to believe that their statement is proven fact (see also, Josef Goebbels)
When some one makes an assertion in an effort to convey what might/might-not be a scientific fact (such as “sea levels have risen due to anthropogenic climate alterations”) it is ^incumbant^ on the one who makes that statement to provide, at minimum, basic scientific information that confirms their statement.
Take Ol’ Cletus for example: As a classically trained analytical scientist, all my results are subject to my convincing ^all of science^ that the conclusion (not the hypothesis) is defensible. I don’t just get to say, “polyethyldeath is safe for human ingestion; so let’s move to the next question.”