Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
“At the same time, the use of this weapon doesn’t damage or pollute the environment.”

This one statement made me doubt the entire article. A J school grad must have written this article.

12 posted on 09/08/2017 12:44:17 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: texas booster
12: "the use of this weapon doesn’t damage or pollute the environment"

Well, the Hazmat team would probably disagree. Widespread chunks of ISIS meat and fluids would definitely pollute the environment — however, it's a problem we can live with!
 

15 posted on 09/08/2017 2:38:03 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: texas booster; SJackson; LS; BenLurkin

Because you see, US weapons (like those nasty nuclear bombs “we” (racist capitalist white males) used against the Japanese (and might need to use against the North Korean Asian innocents) to end WWII and save lives) DID damage the environment!

Propaganda desguised as news media.


16 posted on 09/08/2017 3:47:37 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson