Skip to comments.It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire U.S. Senate Race
Posted on 09/08/2017 10:46:48 AM PDT by Cheerio
FULL TITLE:Kobach: It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire U.S. Senate Race
For years, the mainstream media has ignored the problem of voter fraud and belittled those of us who are trying to do something about it. And when secretaries of state like me identify cases of fraud, we are told that the number of incidents of voter fraud is too insignificant to matter.
Now, however, facts have come to light that indicate that a pivotal, close election was likely changed through voter fraud on November 8, 2016: New Hampshires U.S. Senate Seat, and perhaps also New Hampshires four electoral college votes in the presidential election.
New Hampshire is one of fifteen states that allow same-day voter registration. The benefit of same-day registration is that it allows a person who has procrastinated or has forgotten to register to nonetheless cast a ballot on election day. The downside of same-day registration is that it does not allow the state time to assess the eligibility of the voter. A volunteer poll worker simply accepts a modicum of identification and takes the voter at his word that hes a U.S. citizen resident of the state who is eligible to vote.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Ohio tried same-day registration for one election in the 70’s and immediately dropped it for THIS very reason.
There is no vote fraud.
It’s ludicrous to even suggest it. ..../S
The Ministry of Propaganda has told us all repeatedly that there is no need to look into voter fraud because it does not exist.
What could be uncovered by looking will astonish.
I imagine this will be featured on 60-Minutes before long. /S
Yet, nothing is being done to rectify this.
“The judicial branch in cahoots with the RAT party...”
Internationalist scu&bags all over the place hiding behind whomever and whatever they can, until they win the revolution through perfidy, stealth, subversion and in the case of ANTIFA, outright violence.
I bet AG Sessions could find a few of these who voted in 2 or more states if he looks
Three paragraphs in and he hasn’t provided the proof.
That should be first paragraph.
Yet, he will never do it.
It shouldn't take much effort to find out if these people also voted in their actual home districts. After all, they have their home addresses. Prosecution should be a slam dunk!
Where are you DOJ?
|Popular Vote||Electoral Vote|
|Hillary Clinton||Timothy Kaine||Democratic||348,526||46.83%||4|
|Donald J. Trump||Michael R. Pence||Republican||345,790||46.46%||0|
|Gary Johnson||William F. Weld||Libertarian||30,777||4.14%||0|
|Dr. Jill Stein||Ajamu Baraka||Green||6,496||0.87%||0|
|Rocky de la Fuente||Michael Steinberg||American Delta||678||0.09%||0|
The left is still stubbornly denying this; they have all kinds of fake studies, articles and experts “debunking” it by calling everyone a liar.
17A effectively repealed the whole Constitution imo. We really need to repeal 17A. 16A can go to.
Next, consider that although Trump is accomplishing a LOT as president, it remains that since the uniparty Congress wants to get rid of him that his first two years in office are arguably for practice. That being said ...
swamp sewer! Drain the sewer!
Remember in November 2018 !
Since corrupt Congress is the biggest part of the sewer (imo) that Trump wants to drain, it is actually up to patriots to drain the sewer in the 2018 elections, patriots supporting Trump by electing as many new members of Congress as they can who will support Trump.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the primary ballots.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitutions Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal governments powers.
Patriots also need to make sure that candidates are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal governments limited powers listed here.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also, unlike incumbent members of Congress who wrongly remained silent while misguided state officials abridged the constitutionally enumerated rights of citizens during the lawless Obama Administration, patriots need to make sure that candidates on the 2018 primary ballots commit to the following.
Candidates need to commit to making and enforcing 14th Amendment-related laws to prosecute misguided state officials who use state powers to abridge constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment-protected religious expression and free speech for example, such actions prohibited by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Again, drain the sewer! Drain the sewer!
The “proof” was that thousands voted with out-of-state drivers licenses and most of them haven’t applied for either NH driver licenses or car registration. Of course it is entirely plausible that thousands “moved” to NH on election day, voted, realized that NH wasn’t quite the thing and “moved” back to their home states before the polls closed.
I wonder how many were college students from out of state, who decided to vote in NH as a close election. That might explain them not following through with licenses and car registrations. If they didn’t also vote in the home state, it’s not fraud.
Some of them might have even voted for Trump.
You can be sure it did. A hundred bus loads of criminal activists.
They are saying it could be out-of-state college students voting. They are allowed to vote in NH. Of course, they might never get a NH license.
This would be a piece o’ cake to check out.
Don’t know who would be willing to do the investigation, though. The Dems are betting no one.
I bought and sold in a new state. I’m still registered in the old one. Not my job to correct it. Now I’m living in a 3rd state and was told I could still vote in the 2nd. Local GOP chairman confirmed it. I’m sure they would see me as a ‘person of interest’. The only thing they would have on me is I don’t live there or have a drivers license. I only voted once. Therefore those that voted twice would have to vote as a dead person still on the rolls. Too easy to get away with.
Whoops, missed your comment. My #18 is basically a repeat.
But this is something that should be easy to check.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.