Professor tells students that right-wing terrorism more of a threat than Islamic terrorism

The College Fix ^ | September 11, 2017 | Staff

[SkyDancer]

Yeah, not baking that cake will cause buildings to erupt in fire and crash, planes falling out of the skies, tuna going for a buck a can.

[353FMG]

Was the “professor” a muzzie?

[Sirius Lee]

What right wing terrorism?

Chalk on a sidewalk.

[353FMG]

Her latest pronounciation will surely earn her the PhD that she is after.

[rrrod]

Another reminder...we cannot lose

[right way right]

You have to realize that this Kook thinks every comment in this thread is a Right Wing Extremist terrorist attack.

This is how these Lemmings think. (Apologies to Lemmings)

[faithhopecharity]

“right wing terrorism” CAN exist, yes, but it is so rare nowadays as to be almost non-existent

the biggest threats are Islam (Muslim)..... and the communistic crowd that befriend them

almost all serious terrorism and mayhem and mass-murder in the world comes from the extreme Left (and it has been this way for a long time, too). Call them communists, socialists, progressivists, Nazis, IslamoNazis, BLT, Occupy Whatever, AntiFa, or anything else SorozNazi funds and promotes....the lines blur, anyway, as their funding and organization has so much in common

[DoughtyOne]

This is about all I know about her. I didn't read all of it, because her reverse bias is so childish in it's findings > IMO.

Kearns, who now works as an assistant professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Alabama, has made similar arguments in her published scholarly research.

In a research paper, Kearns and her co-authors write that Muslims only committed 12.4 percent of the terrorist attacks from 2011 to 2015, but received 44 percent of the news coverage. They also argue that attacks by Muslim perpetrators received on average 449 percent more news coverage than other attacks during this timeframe.

If you realize the Islamic segment of our society is still pegged at 1% LINK, the stats are glaringly lopsided by this groups actions and deaths caused.

This idiot stick is picking and choosing statistics to buttress her claims. Other glaring statistics are ignored. One small point: While only 1% of our populace, this group by her own admission conducted 12.5% of the nations terrorist acts. Their outcomes document the vast majority of terrorist related deaths too.

I also question just what the other (supposed) 87.5% of the terrorist acts actually amounted to.

Are we talking about key scratches on a car, a racial comment, or some other verbal metric, not even in the same ball-park as the Islamic acts of terrorism?

Her research reminds me most of a road apple.

[polymuser]

Erin considers typical grandpas more of a threat than young muzzie guys?

Hear that, young muzzie guys?

[Trillian]

A lot of liars in the “teaching” profession.

[Innovative]

And why is she still employed???

[Flintlock]

Please—she’s RIGHT of course.

.....in HER WORLD.......the world of Leftoid craziness’, and globalist BS and ‘ONE WORLD’ “no borders” Marxism.

Trust me—she is RIGHT to fear us ‘right-wingers’. “ant-fah” is simply the storm troopers on HER SIDE of the political isle.

Nothing to FEAR—not to the leftists who art taking us over, anyway.

[clearcarbon]

"Professor tells students that right-wing terrorism more of a threat than Islamic terrorism"

Islamic terrorists are less likely to fire her.

[shanover]

The beotch would feel right at home in today's FBI.

I wish I had the time to care and rip apart all of Her bullshite "research". There is zero chance this fraud and fake teacher can prove Her statement.

[HLPhat]

>>Communists and ISIS are the enemy

Where would that put the successors to Herbie Marcuse and his Cultural Marxist playmates in the Deep State?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Who+Armed+Isis

[A_perfect_lady]

They're getting this data from a study by a left wing think tank called New America (dot org) which was then referenced by Washington Post about a year ago. They carefully time frame it to exclude 9/11 (of course) and they include all attacks on police by white extremists as "right wing terror" but exclude almost all attacks by blacks (except the BLM in Dallas). They also include such "terrorist" attacks as a couple of robberies gone wrong and at least one that could easily be classified as a domestic (man killed his own wife, but he was a white nationalist, so this is "terrorism.") It's absolutely a joke of a study. Seriously, it's like a 9th grader came up with it.

Oh, they also exclude all planned or attempted Muslim attacks that were foiled by the FBI (of which there have been HUNDREDS. They actually listed them in their data base, but left them all off the chart at the end because, hey, they were foiled, so they don't count.

[Zeneta]

I’m actually watching this video right now.

Former ‘Antifa’ Speaks Out

Stefan Molyneux

Only 12 minutes into this hour long video, but very interesting insight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN2ZTpqr8sQ

[Eagles6]

So she considers the West, TX fertilizer plant explosion an act of right wing terror allowing her to make her false assertion despite the fact that no one was blamed or arrested nor claimed responsibility.

I guess Orlando and San Bernardino were right wing too because they were done by "conservatives" (mooslims).

[Eagles6]

Howzabout we look at the last 16 yrs and 1 day, not the last decade?

[Zeneta]

I don’t imagine you are watching the video I linked.

I’m at around 1:04 that’s an hour into it.

Listen to the context and this “Former Antifa” member.

He listened to Ann Coulter and was blown away. Stating his attempts convince his friends that Trump was to the left of Clinton.

It’s nuts, but very insightful.