Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

The headline is misleading to say the least. The case is still up for review, but the Court postponed the oral argument in light of recent executive action and want to give the parties time to address it. Which is very sensible.

It’s not that they won’t hear the case. Clickbait.


29 posted on 09/25/2017 3:09:15 PM PDT by henkster (The View: A psychiatric group therapy session where the shrink has stepped out of the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: henkster

Even so delayed, federal law is clear on this that the Executive has control over the borders and aliens. The court is not going to reverse itself from a few short years ago under Obama. Arizona v. U.S. 2012:

“Held:

1. The Federal Government’s broad, undoubted power over immigration and alien status rests, in part, on its constitutional power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” Art. I, §8, cl. 4, and on its inherent sovereign power to control and conduct foreign relations, see Toll v. Moreno, 458 U. S. 1. Federal governance is extensive and complex. Among other things, federal law specifies categories of aliens who are ineligible to be admitted to the United States, 8 U. S. C. §1182; “

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182

And Kennedy wrote the opinion.


38 posted on 09/25/2017 3:24:08 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: henkster

Thank you henkster for your cogent response, but my simple mind wants to know, can our POTUS ban these terrorists or not.


68 posted on 09/25/2017 6:18:47 PM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson