Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

Also see:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/25/politics/travel-ban-3-0-could-derail-supreme-court-case/index.html

“In general, when one policy expires and a new policy is developed, the court may consider any challenge to the expired policy to be moot,” said Irv Gornstein, the executive director of the Supreme Court Institute at Georgetown Law. Gornstein stressed he was talking generally, but he suggested that if the parties are no longer affected by the new policy, or its impact has changed, there may not be the injury that is necessary to establish a case — potentially meaning things will have to start anew. “


31 posted on 09/25/2017 3:11:48 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Innovative
 
 
Which I take to mean the ACLU-Muslim Brotherhood axis is scrambling lawyers to re-file another suit or two to run through the 9th circus.
 
 

45 posted on 09/25/2017 3:51:13 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson