Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. Circuit lets stand concealed-carry ruling, cheering gun-rights activists
The Washington Times ^ | Andrea Noble

Posted on 09/28/2017 4:00:32 PM PDT by jazusamo

Case could head to Supreme Court

In a win for gun rights advocates, a federal appeals court on Thursday decided to let stand a ruling that found it is unconstitutional to require firearms owners prove a “good reason” in order to be permitted to carry a concealed handgun in the nation’s capital.

The D.C. government had petitioned for the full D.C. Circuit to rehear the case en banc, but the court declined to revisit the 2-1 decision handed down earlier this year noting that none of the 10 judges who considered the matter requested a vote on it.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; concealedcarry; dcappealscourt; gunrights; washingtondc

1 posted on 09/28/2017 4:00:32 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Huge win.


2 posted on 09/28/2017 4:02:16 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

YES...Hopefully they take it to SCOTUS and get the ‘good reason’ shot down for the nation.


3 posted on 09/28/2017 4:06:07 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Here’s the “good reason”: The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 4:14:41 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I believe the USSC let the 9th Circuit Peruta case stand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peruta_v._San_Diego_County

The good news is now we have conflicting opinions in the Circuit Courts of Appeals and the USSC MUST resolve it.

There’s no way they can let these conflicting rulings stand.

And, we have Gorsuch on the bench now. Maybe that is why the Court didn’t decide Peruta.

They were waiting for a 9th Judge. And a 5th Conservative.


5 posted on 09/28/2017 4:25:41 PM PDT by Mariner (Pink Pussy Hats for the NFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

But will things change? Do will DC drag its feet. Congress has oversight and should rule that all state CCW valid in federal district, the District of Columbia.. then allow locals to have their own CCW.


6 posted on 09/28/2017 4:28:00 PM PDT by Reno89519 (PRESIDENT TRUMP, KEEP YOUR PROMISES! NO AMNESTY AND BUILD THAT WALL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Wow.

Excellent!


7 posted on 09/28/2017 4:38:22 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I hope the SCOTUS has the same reaction.

Hey, it’s the law. “sod off”


8 posted on 09/28/2017 4:39:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Does this mean that I won’t have to prove Just Cause if I apply for a CCW in Orange County, CA?


9 posted on 09/28/2017 4:41:51 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Thanks for your input! I was just wondering how this current decision would interface with Peruta. SCOTUS here we come (I hope).


10 posted on 09/28/2017 4:42:46 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Believe me, I do too!


11 posted on 09/28/2017 5:16:44 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
" : ^ )
12 posted on 09/28/2017 5:19:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The good news is now we have conflicting opinions in the Circuit Courts of Appeals and the USSC MUST resolve it.


Nope. They *should* resolve it. But they are not required to resolve it. They have been extremely unwilling to take another Second Amendment case, especially on the topic of carry outside the home.

I think it is a toss-up if they will.

If Trump appoints another justice...

They *will* take it.


13 posted on 09/28/2017 9:04:56 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

They got a new female sheriff awhile back,, I don’t think she even issues concealed carry permits.


14 posted on 09/29/2017 5:59:35 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson