Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If North Korea Fires an ICBM, the US Might Have to Shoot It Down Over Russia
Defense One ^ | 2017-09-30

Posted on 09/30/2017 5:31:21 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

If North Korea Fires an ICBM, the US Might Have to Shoot It Down Over Russia



Missile-defense physics may require interceptors to fly into ‘the teeth of the Russian early warning net.’

If Pyongyang fires a missile at the United States, its most-likely trajectory would take it over the North Pole. A U.S. attempt to shoot down that missile would probably occur within Russian radar space — and possibly over Russia itself. “It’s something we’re aware of,” Gen. Lori Robinson, who leads both U.S. Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, said Wednesday. “It’s something we work our way through.”

By year’s end, the U.S. will have deployed 44 ground-based interceptors, or GBIs: 40 at Fort Greeley, Alaska, and four at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. If deterrence fails, those interceptors would be the last line of defense against a North Korean missile. Each incoming ICBM might be met with four or more GBIs.

Last week, Joshua Pollack told an audience at the annual Air Force Association conference in Washington D.C. that the most probable intercept route aims the U.S. GBI “into the teeth of the Russian early warning net.”

The actual route will depend on the incoming missile’s course and speed, and just how quickly the U.S. system can react. Pollack, a researcher at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, elaborated in a subsequent writeup of his presentation. “Defending a West Coast target…means engaging the attacking [reentry vehicle] above the Russian Far East. Yikes.”

(Excerpt) Read more at defenseone.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: missiledefense; nkorea; russia

1 posted on 09/30/2017 5:31:21 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; Grampa Dave; ...

P!


2 posted on 09/30/2017 5:31:45 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

One would think the Russians would be less than happy with the prospect of North Korea launching nuclear-armed missiles on trajectories that took them over thousands of miles of Russian territory.


3 posted on 09/30/2017 5:41:40 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

With their track record, I wouldn’t want a North Korean nuke flying over my air space. I’d take it out, and keep flying to take out any North Korean nuclear capability.


4 posted on 09/30/2017 5:59:30 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Wouldn't the missile also go over China? What would they think of an ICBM flying over their territory? Why would WE have to shoot down a missile over Russia? Wouldn't the Russians?

I really think these missile launches by NK are just to prove they can do it, for potential buyers out there interested in making a clandestine nuke attack against the West.

5 posted on 09/30/2017 6:14:55 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Trump should let Putin know in no uncertain terms if a Nork missile is on a ballistic track towards North America over the territory of Russia, it will be incumbent upon Russia to shoot it down themselves, lest Trump deem it that Russia is complicit in the attack and thereby suffer the consequences. Shall we all start trading cities à la FailSafe?


6 posted on 09/30/2017 6:16:13 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

“Fail Safe?”

Staring the jackass dull actor that spawned Hanoi Jane.

I always thought the plot was stupid.


7 posted on 09/30/2017 6:36:39 AM PDT by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Trump should let Putin Xi know in no uncertain terms if a Nork missile is on a ballistic track towards North America over the territory of Russia China, it will be incumbent upon Russia China to shoot it down themselves, lest Trump deem it that Russia China is complicit in the attack and thereby suffer the consequences. Shall we all start trading cities à la FailSafe?
8 posted on 09/30/2017 6:40:50 AM PDT by null and void (Because it's a firearms related word, I'm triggered by "trigger"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom

Will cell phones screech?


9 posted on 09/30/2017 6:42:06 AM PDT by null and void (Because it's a firearms related word, I'm triggered by "trigger"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Ahhhh -’Fail Safe’ great movie!!!


10 posted on 09/30/2017 7:12:49 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Uh...let’s not worry about what Russia claims:

“That suggests that if the U.S. spotted a launch and tried to intercept it, Russia might claim that the U.S. was acting provocatively and not in self-defense. “

Russia isn’t in the business of aiding U.S. AMB design or effectiveness.


11 posted on 09/30/2017 8:35:58 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Here’s a totally out of the box idea. If/when fat boy launches a missile over Russian air space, Putin shoots it down and returns one back. Two birds, one stone. Putin would get brownie points for saving the US and for eliminating a tubby thug.


12 posted on 09/30/2017 8:36:52 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“... deployed 44 ground-based interceptors, or GBIs: 40 at Fort Greeley, Alaska, and four at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. If deterrence fails, those interceptors would be the last line of defense against a North Korean missile. Each incoming ICBM might be met with four or more GBIs.”

48/4=12. Book title: “The Thirteenth Missile”.


13 posted on 09/30/2017 9:09:36 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

“If/when fat boy launches a missile over Russian air space, Putin shoots it down and returns one back.”


Russia will not reveal actual military capabilities to save the US. Nor would Putin take out a the cash cow that is NOKO.


14 posted on 09/30/2017 9:12:19 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

No one in the industry believes that Russia nor China has fielded the ability to shoot one down.


15 posted on 09/30/2017 9:12:46 AM PDT by JP1201
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
Why would WE have to shoot down a missile over Russia? Wouldn't the Russians?

They can't on that trajectory. The time over China is negligible. The little box on the graphic is the interception area.

16 posted on 09/30/2017 9:49:36 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson