Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robroys woman

AT one point, Hillary said there’s no one to give the money back to.

I don’t get this. Weinstein, or some organization controlled by Weinstein, gave money to Hillary, her campaign, or the Clinton Foundation, or some combination of these entities controlled by the Clintons. Why can’t she give back the money to the organizations controlled by Weinstein which gave her the money? Why would she say there’s nobody to give the money back to, and for that reason, she will give it to charity?


7 posted on 10/12/2017 7:41:47 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

My guess is that she doesn’t want to appear to be supporting him financially.

But no matter to me. I have zero respect for any of them anyway, no matter WHAT she does with the money. She could give it all to ME and my position would not change.


10 posted on 10/12/2017 7:43:25 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

What about the fund raising parties? Surely if you were invited at $100,000/plate, there would be a record of those in attendance, and those folks would want their money back.

Weinstein was just the bundler?


52 posted on 10/12/2017 9:11:50 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson