Posted on 10/21/2017 10:26:03 AM PDT by Oatka
The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) says it is deeply concerned over proposed legislation that would ban crude oil tankers from operating in Canadian waters off Northern British Columbia.
The Canadian Parliament is giving consideration to legislation that would have the effect of establishing a moratorium on the shipment of crude oil in the waters of Northern British Columbia. The proposed legislation is known as Bill C-48: An Act respecting the regulation of vessels that transport crude oil or persistent oil to or from ports or marine installations located along British Columbia’s north coast.
The ICS, representing the world’s national shipowners’ associations and 80% of the world merchant fleet, has voiced deep concern about the proposal, which it says will interfere with international maritime trade.
“Such a draconian step could lead to serious concerns being raised by Canada’s international trading partners” said ICS Director of Policy and External Relations, Simon Bennett.
ICS argues that the proposals have not been developed through an evidence-based process, and believes that it would establish an unwelcome precedent that might be emulated elsewhere, including in the United States, with the potential to greatly impact the efficiency of world trade, as well as that of Canada.
ICS says that the environmental record of the shipping industry, especially the tanker sector, is impressive. On average, worldwide, there are currently fewer than two significant oil spills (over 700 tonnes) per year, compared to 25 such incidents per year thirty years ago, despite a doubling of the amount of oil transported by sea.
“We would instead encourage Canada to continue its strong history of environmental protection and support for responsible global trade through the implementation of practical measures consistent with international best practice. This includes respecting the UN International Maritime Organization’s role in developing safe and sustainable shipping regulations and recommendations that might address any concerns that Canada may have” said Mr Bennett.
ICS says that the global shipping industry fully recognizes the importance of robust environmental protection measures, and is committed to the goal of zero pollution, consistent with the comprehensive global regulatory framework adopted by the International Maritime Organization, in accordance with the United Nations Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to which Canada is a State Party.
This legislation, which was introduced to the Canadian parliament in May, was expected to be reviewed by a parliamentary committee beginning this week.
"ICS argues that the proposals have not been developed through an evidence-based process"
Just like "Climate Change".
The Saudis and Iranians approve.
Maybe Canadians like high priced gas and heating oil.
But! It will save the veils!!
...and whales...
It’s not Canada ,it’s that Punch Drunk Pothead Trudeau
Yep. The people making the decision don't live in BC. And there's nothing liberals love more than running other people's lives in faraway places, as anyone living in Flyover Country in the U.S. can attest.
Just like GM cars ... going all electric for 2023.
Note. Power consumption to greatly increase, as well as power bills ...
Northern BC about to become even colder.
This measure is likely aimed at impeding Canadian energy EXPORTS.
“This measure is likely aimed at impeding Canadian energy EXPORTS.”
yep. And the Canadian economy approaches a third world economy from the perspective that practically the only thing they export are raw materials and A LOT of them at that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.