[Atticus]

I am not good at math. A calculator in my hand is a deadly weapon. So somebody please explain to me how someone can be responsible for more than 100% of something.

[Stosh]

” . . . explain to me how someone can be responsible for more than 100% of something.”

We’re responsible for 100% of the global warming that hasn’t happened, and we’re also responsible for 23% more that hasn’t happened but might have happened if the original 100% hadn’t happened.

[Shady]

It’s called fake but accurate. Typical tool of the Tyrants!

[Bob434]

it is 123% certain that our 0.00136% CO2 is causing massive global warming-

this is akin to saying that placing an average sized lit candle in an indoor football stadium is causing massive climate change-

Or, it’;s like claiming that dumping 4 5 gallon pails of 100 degree water into an olympic sized pool of 90 degree water will cause catastrophic pool warming (4 five gallon pails = roughly 0.00135% of the contents of the pool)

Because the math doesn’t support the wild claims- they have to pad their results to make it seem more dangerous- hence the 123% figure- sounds scary and finite huh?

[MPJackal]

It's easy, humans are responsible for 123% of warming, but not responsible for 123% of cooling. Net increase is zero. But humans are still bad.

[smokingfrog]

Seems to me they would have to have some evidence that the earth would be otherwise cooling down if it were not for mankind causing the warming to claim such a thing.

[Calvin Locke]

It’s the AGW equivalent mentality (and IQ) of “up to eleven”. /”This Is Spinal Tap.”