Science proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.

NBC News ^ | November 15, 2017 | Travis Rieder

[The_Media_never_lie]

Have you ever noticed how "environmentalists" who complain about too many people never want to do anything to restrict massive Third World immigration, without which US and European population growth would be near zero. Nor do they ever complain about Third World people having too many children.

---

So true.

[ronniesgal]

let me guess...just white people. India and and the middle easterns, carry on

[lastchance]

Do these geniuses have no notion of their own selfish continuing strain on Mother Gaia? Have they no cliffs nearby?

[jonascord]

Instead of limiting ALL breeding, there is another option.

We simply convince everyone with an IQ of lower than, say, 85, to voluntarily walk into a government run booth. There is a bright flash, and a pile of ashes. It's called eugenics.

Democrats and their various voting blocks will sorta take it in the shorts, but I'm sure they will understand, since it's for the Common Good. We could tag them as "Anti-Gaia".

We could throw in SAT scores, and ACT scores along with ASVAB, sort of a combination deal, and convince all the college students that the booth is a "safe space". Anyone that stupid would be a prime candidate...

[Mr. Blond]

But just white kids.

[SkyDancer]

Having a two year old is like running a food blender with the top off.

[lastchance]

All kidding aside. Just decades ago such amoral philosophy would not have seen the light of day in any mainstream publication or news outlet. It would be considered akin to praising the Nazis for their foresight in reducing Germany’s post WWII economic burden by a bold plan of population resettlement and eradication of certain persons during the war years.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Liberals should stop having children.

[lastchance]

It is disgusting to refer to any human being as a breeder.

[BlueLancer]

...and convince all the college students that the booth is a "safe space". Anyone that stupid would be a prime candidate...

[lastchance]

Only messier.

[C19fan]

The BBC Dr. Who spin off “Torchwood” broached that topic. The show message was how horrible that decision was but I thought it was making the best of a list of horrible choices.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

RINOcraps are bad for the earth, can we get rid of them?

[Blood of Tyrants]

The implications that the “wealthy”, i.e. anyone in the first world, use much more resources than people in turd world countries.

[DungeonMaster]

As if this is a new idea.

"If they be like to die they better do it and decrease the surplus population" Scrooge.

[left that other site]

Interesting that they use the word “environment”.

“Environment” means “a place for life to live”. If no one lives there, it is an ecosystem, not an environment.

[lastchance]

Perhaps because we live longer. It could also be because we have more of those resources at our disposal and within our means. Both are a result of a higher standard of living. You would think that a good thing, wouldn’t you? But not Liberals. Oh how they long for the good old days of dung fires, dung huts, and dung dinners.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

I guess, ‘Science’ has spoken:

“No more babies for White, Christian, Heterosexual Couples!”

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

They have NO morality.

[Vaquero]

Too bad. There is a movement to remove Americans and Europeans by out breeding us.