I think the fact that Judge Moore was the presiding judge on Gloria Allred’s client’s divorce case to be pretty damn significant.
Especially since she alleged to have never met up with him again after the yearbook signing.
Yes, lawyers were implying that the woman or Alred copied signature from that document. Moore was not D.A., but his assistant’s initials were D.A.
There is a LOT Of ‘significance’ going on here!
The big news is a double whammy:
1. Nelson claimed that after the ‘encounter’ at the restaurant, she NEVER had contact with Roy Moore again. Roy Moore was the judge before which Nelson’s divorce case was heard so there WAS contact - she lied.
2. Roy Moore’s signature was often stamped & his assistant always signed his initials after a stamped signature. The assistant’s initials were “D.A.” (Delbert something - I missed totally catching the last name). This is how Moore’s name appeared on Nelson’s divorce papers. A little odd that the signature in the yearbook includes the “D.A.” Moore was never a D.A., but an A.D.A. He was a circuit judge at the time of Nelson’s divorce. I think whoever tried to tie Moore to Nelson & the restaurant where she worked using the yearbook screwed up - used the signature on the divorce papers as the model for the yearbook entry. The D.A. addition to the signature is damning, IMO.
Is that a fact? Do you have a link?
Especially since she alleged to have never met up with him again after the yearbook signing.
I suspected there might be a grudge hidden in there somewhere. Is there a source for this?
Bump.