Posted on 11/27/2017 4:39:51 PM PST by Sub-Driver
A woman approached The Post with dramatic and false tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.
By Shawn Boburg, Aaron C. Davis and Alice Crites November 27 at 5:55 PM
A woman who falsely claimed to The Washington Post that Roy Moore, the Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Alabama, impregnated her as a teenager appears to work with an organization that uses deceptive tactics to secretly record conversations in an effort to embarrass its targets.
In a series of interviews over two weeks, the woman shared a dramatic story about an alleged sexual relationship with Moore in 1992 that led to an abortion when she was 15. During the interviews, she repeatedly pressed Post reporters to give their opinions on the effects that her claims could have on Moores candidacy if she went public.
The Post did not publish an article based on her unsubstantiated account. When Post reporters confronted her with inconsistencies in her story and an Internet posting that raised doubts about her motivations, she insisted that she was not working with any organization that targets journalists.
But on Monday morning, Post reporters saw her walking into the New York offices of Project Veritas, an organization that targets the mainstream news media and left-leaning groups. The organization sets up undercover stings that involve using false cover stories and covert video recordings meant to expose what the group says is media bias.
James OKeefe, the founder of Project Veritas who was convicted of a misdemeanor in 2010 for using a fake identity to enter a federal building during a previous sting, declined to answer questions about the woman outside the Project Veritas office, a storefront in Mamaroneck, N.Y., on Monday morning shortly after the woman walked inside.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
In the comments section of the Post’s website, some commenter is repeatedly posting that Phillips was telling the truth and asking those who say otherwise why they’re defending Moore. it’s driving them crazy.
I’m afraid you’re right. The WaPo knew their stories were fake or probably fake. WaPo “trusted” the source who brought them the stories, e.g., Ms Allred herself.
They we’re tiped off, less they would have spotted the same inconsitancies in the other women’s stories.
Such as the non-existent parking lot, the Forged signature, the political associations, ect...
This story cannot be true as reported because we know the Post will print any crap that promotes their ideology, true or not. Their “poll” today proves that.
Doug Jones said today that all of Moore’s accusers should be believed. Someone should ask him if that includes this woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.