“Sorry, but just more meddling where they shouldn’t even exist.”
Fine, then get rid of them - all K-12 “public schools”.
But don’t keep them open, anyone of them, on “charitable” grounds” and then tax people to support them.
Yet, admit it - THAT is never going to happen.
So, as you will not in our lifetimes eliminate taxes for K-12 public education, then at least make 100% of their use the choice of the parents and NOT something “public schools” thinks “belongs” to them.
But you go ahead and be what you think is a “pure” Conservative, like Don Quixote, and I’ll keep working on what I think will transform the commitment to K-12 education from the “public school protection racket” to a system where parents chose their kids school - public, private, secular or religious.
Jivanka and their socialite friends will all take hundreds of thousands of dollars in deductions on this annually in a sickening concentration of taxpayers paying for excess and luxury for a few.
Yeah, public schools are expensive and mediocre, but we are all burdened with paying for them—not just those with children.
>
But don’t keep them open, anyone of them, on “charitable” grounds” and then tax people to support them.
Yet, admit it - THAT is never going to happen.
>
Oh, I’ll readily admit those that profess to be ‘small govt’ (C)\(R) will HAPPILY switch to their flavor of Fascism.
I’m consistent in calling ‘em out.
>
But you go ahead and be what you think is a “pure” Conservative, like Don Quixote, and I’ll keep working on what I think will transform the commitment to K-12 education from the “public school protection racket” to a system where parents chose their kids school - public, private, secular or religious.
>
Oh, I do LOVE the ‘purity’ test espoused by some around here. Either, you are for the Constitution and the Rights acknowledged or you’re not. Don’t go hiding behind, “Well, it’s not that way ‘today’, *SOOooooo*...” BS.
Enjoy trying to sanitize the pig-pen while wallowing in the s*.