Zullo Provides New Insights on Obama Birth Certificate Mystery, Part 3

The Post & Email ^ | 12/6/2017 | Sharon Rondeau

[Elderberry]

In his Friday interview with Carl Gallups, Obama birth certificate investigator Mike Zullo indicated for the first time that he believes the “short-form” birth certificate bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama II” was “officially” produced by the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), although likely from a “surreptitious record” planted in the database by remote intrusion.

On June 8, 2008, an image of a short-form birth certificate, or “Certification of Live Birth,” apparently demonstrating Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, HI appeared at The Daily KOS, the Obama campaign’s “Fight the Smears” website, Politifact and other websites, reportedly to quell doubts that Obama was not born in the United States and therefore could be ineligible to serve as president.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen,” which most Americans understand to mean, “born in the United States.” However, some scholars believe that a simple birth in the country is insufficient to satisfy the “natural born” requirement and that the candidate’s parents must have possessed U.S. citizenship prior to his birth within the United States.

Questions about Obama’s presidential eligibility first arose in 2007 in light of credible, mainstream media reports stating that he was born in Kenya or Indonesia. As the primary cycle concluded and Obama received the Democratic nomination, many Americans became concerned that Obama’s reported assumption of Indonesian citizenship when he lived there as a child and his claimed British-citizen father were disqualifying factors in addition to questions over his birthplace.

[Fantasywriter]

Please share a little insider information with me. I have interacted with Obots for years, and still the basic question remains. Are you people *really* as clueless as you pretend to be, or is it simply a useful act?

Originally I didn’t believe *anyone* could be so imperceptive and intellectually limited. I posted on the assumption that Obots knew and understood the facts as well as I did, but just used trolling tactics to burn up conservatives’ time and energy.

However, the longer I interact with Obots, the more inclined I am to see them as genuinely clueless. Where Obama is concerned, they simply cannot process basic facts. It’s like a short circuit in the mind; whenever anything threatens the Obama-friendly narrative, the Obot switches to auto-pilot and spouts canned, irrelevant lines.

You could resolve this issue...but it would require honesty.

[Fantasywriter]

‘So you have no evidence at all that ties Stanley Ann Dunham or Barack Obama Sr. to a Salvation Army facility in Vancouver. None.’

Btw, this is the opposite of what I actually said. If you go back and reread my posts, you can see that for yourself.

You’re working too hard to establish your retreaded zotted Obot troll status. It’s unnecessary. You already fit the profile to perfection.

[Fantasywriter]

A little slow on the uptake, PT? I have politely asked you several questions. Not only have you not answered even one; you pretend they don’t exist. That is the Obot MO: to pretend anything they don’t like is nonexistent.

Just so you know, I’m serious about learning what makes Obots tick. As I stated above, it’s one of two things. Either Obama’s most blindly dedicated fans are genuinely and sincerely clueless, or they are consummate liars. Pick one, because there’s no third category.

To illustrate with the case in point. If you are anything short of ignorant and mentally challenged, then you could answer the Vancouver question yourself. Otoh, if your abilities are such that you have no idea how Vancouver figures into the narrative, then you’re in the wrong discussion. You need, at a minimum, to be able to add 2 plus 2 and get 4, if you want to be taken seriously.

Here is the bottom-line problem with Obots. They absolutely and resolutely do ***NOT*** want the truth. If they did, they would take the lead in answering the hard questions. For example, Obots would have a plausible explanation as to why no one in HI saw Stanley Ann for ~10 mos, and THE FIRST confirmed sighting of her with the baby occurred 2,683 miles from Honolulu.

There are many, many other issues Obots would attempt to resolve IF they wanted the truth. But in fact, they want anything but the truth. Any lie, regardless of how ridiculous or nonfactual, is embraced if it supports Obama. Any fact that contradicts Obama’s snarled, implausible birth narrative is summarily rejected.

Here is a second example. Obots have actually attempted to explain why the address listed on Obama’s fabricated BC is not one where SA lived during her pregnancy or immediately after the birth. The explanations have all been without the flimsiest factual foundation and, frankly, were too pathetic to do an adult mind credit. But Obots simply do not care. They don’t want the truth; they want an Obama-friendly lie.

Sadly for you, you fit the Obot profile to a T. The only question is, are you actually as dense as you make yourself out to be, or are you just pretending.

[Fantasywriter]

Your trollish behavior is so boringly predictable and childish. Obots are all the same. Either they are mind-numbingly stupid or inveterate liars. Who has time for that?

I could explain the smoking gun, but are you—shameless Obot troll that you are—intelligent enough and honest enough to understand?

Let’s see. The first verified sighting of Stanley Ann with a baby, which was it closer to: HI, or a Salvation Army home for unwed mothers?

Bonus/extra-credit: by how many miles was this sighting closer to one than to the other?

If you can answer the first question intelligently and honestly, then we can talk. (If you can answer the bonus question...but let’s not get ahead of yourselves.)

[All too easily predicted Obot troll response: ‘So there’s no smoking gun.’ You need to face the facts: you have neither the intelligence nor the integrity for anything above and beyond Obot talking points. If it were otherwise, you wouldn’t be a retread zotted Obot troll.]

[Fantasywriter]

yourselves = ourselves