[Alberta's Child]

Moore was a terrible candidate by any objective measure. One reason I say this is that he was totally ill-equipped to serve in a legislative role. He gave every indication that he would have been an enormous pain in the ass in Washington, and would have accomplished absolutely nothing for his efforts.

A guy like that is much better in a judicial post or an executive branch appointment.

[DiogenesLamp]

Moore was a terrible candidate by any objective measure.

You apparently have a very subjective understanding of the word "objective." He was 28 points ahead before the accusations against him were made. How does "bad candidate" comport with a 28 point lead?

He gave every indication that he would have been an enormous pain in the ass in Washington, and would have accomplished absolutely nothing for his efforts.

You see that as a bad thing? I think you and I have different ideas about what needs to be happening in Washington DC. I liked Moore precisely because I expected him to be a huge pain in the ass to the good ole boy system of favor trading and such.

[Hugh the Scot]

I wasn’t sure Moore was a good candidate until I read your post.
Now: We apparently suffered a grievous loss at the hands of the swamp / deep state based on lies and treachery.