That should not be the kind of government that any conservative wants. That would simply be a police state with an R instead of a D.
Do you concede that we already live in a post-constitutional, full-spectrum surveillance state? If not, then can you explain why thousands of private citizens, and then a presidential candidate, were openly spied upon, with multiple dozens of government employees privy to their private record & communications?
If yes, then the next question is very easy: would you prefer to live in a police state that enforced AA, PC, open borders, muslim infiltration, IRS harassment, etc OR one that protected private property, the 1A with respect to not only speech, but association (religion, business service), used 4A surveillance against our opposition, encouraged domestic investment and job growth, etc?
Remember, you don't have the choice of deciding whether or not to live in a police state. You already do - the essential question is: who should be in charge?
That horse left the barn some time ago. America is already a Police State. And in the near future an overpopulated Third World s***hole to go along with it.
Equality at last! Thank Gaia Almighty equality at last!