U.S. Supreme Court will hear Texas redistricting case

Dems are epitome of evil and sleazy politicians. There will be inevitable civil war within 20 years. Races can’t live together especially when they want to rehash slavery over and over even though white men died to end it.

I would like the Texas Supreme Court to order a complete voter ID program.

For a given population, say 20M, there are a nearly infinite number of ways to draw lines to separate that into 650K person congressional districts or some other number state senate districts, etc.

It is inherently arbitrary, and any time you hear that someone has a more equitable and unbiased approach, look out. This is why the proper approach for the SCOTUS on this and other cases (Whitburn - the Wisconsin Case) is to declare this a political question, on e not for the Court, but rather for the legislatures of the states involved.

Looking at the maps of the districts, it’s pretty obvious to me that there are definite political or person motivations for the way many of them were drawn.

I would also suggest that there are many black and other minority Congressmen who are completely happy with the way they are drawn because they are virtually assured of staying in office as long as they want.

If the Supreme Court requires them to be drawn in a more compact way, the Republican legislature could do so and place 2-3 Democrats in the same district.

These districts are drawn to protect Congressmen in both parties.

So glad they are looking at Maryland to. That is a disgrace the way Democrats have it.

When the FL legislature went GOP, the rats got a constitutional amendment on the ballot which, in so many words, punted the shape of congressional districts to the FL supreme court . . . which is reliable leftist.

I despise referenda.

ridesthemiles wrote:”I would like the Texas Supreme Court to order a complete voter ID program.”

...AND, force them to remove all the dead, all the felons, and illegal alien motor/voters from the roll and redraw with real data. Just to be fair. Voter ID required and enforced to keep it fair.

SS1

Races can’t live together especially when they want to rehash slavery over and over

If one only hears the voices of SJWs, BLM, race hustlers, and loudmouth black leftists, one might conclude that all blacks think that way. They don't.

This is DEMOCRAT Sheila Jackson Lee's district. Now, tell me again it's the Republican's fault.

Good lord,that looks like a Rorschach test.

Another Democrat District.

Yeah, no gerrymandering there...lol.

We drew the Tex districts, and packed rats in safe seats to keep them from polluting the others, as we damn well should have. There is no other choice. If you spread the Blacks out you get more White democrats and fewer Republicans.

Just 90% of them.

FROM THE "RETIRE SHEILA JACKSON LEE" FILES

What's Driving Miss Shelia?
TIM FLECK | FEBRUARY 20, 1997 | Houston Press

Only five days into her first term as a member of Congress, Sheila Jackson Lee hurried into her small office in the Longworth Building. Back home, while serving on the Houston City Council, Lee had forged a reputation as a brusque and imperious boss, and her short time in Washington hadn't changed her. "I want that ASAP" seemed to be her favorite phrase -- and on this day, she had a rush order for her legislative director, Meredith Jones.

In January 1995, the 104th Congress was fizzing with the arrival of Newt Gingrich's freshman warriors. Lee, one of the relatively few new Democrats, was determined to make a splash on the House floor.

Lee coolly informed Jones that the staff had 30 minutes to craft an amendment to a piece of legislation that neither they, nor Lee, had ever seen.

Unlike Lee, Jones was an old hand on Capitol Hill, a ten-year veteran who had worked for Congressman Mike Andrews. She had a reputation as a nuts-and-bolts operative and seemed the perfect navigator for a freshman legislator unfamiliar with Washington do's and don'ts.

Clearly, what Lee was requesting was a don't: Don't waste the time of the other 434 members of the House with a frivolous, ill-considered amendment. A former Lee staffer explains the absurdity of the congresswoman's demand: "Look, you're a freshman. You're in the minority. You don't even know what the goddamn bill is that's being offered. How are you going to offer an amendment to it when you don't even know where the ladies' bathroom is?"

Jones tried not to offend her new employer as she gently explained that rushing to the floor with a slipshod amendment would only damage Lee's credibility. Give the staff more time, pleaded Jones, to do some research and come up with amendments that had a chance of attracting respectful discussion, if not passage, in the Republican-controlled chamber.

Lee glared. When Jones finished, the congresswoman barked, "You now have 29 minutes!"

That incident reveals much about Sheila Jackson Lee. Jones did produce an amendment -- but like a myriad of others that the congresswoman offered in her first term, it went nowhere, while alienating the very people who could make it possible for her to represent her district effectively.

It's a cost Lee has been willing to bear as she pursues other imperatives: Speak, Be Seen, Be Quoted. She won her seat in Congress by defeating Craig Washington, who had lost contact with his constituents. Lee is determined not to make the same mistake, and frenetically tries to ensure that voters in the 18th Congressional District hear and see her on an almost daily basis.

In case the folks back home didn't know that the new congresswoman was hard at work, Lee instructed her staff to spew out mounds of press releases, sometimes four or five a day.

Aides were also told to write "special orders" speeches for Lee to deliver at the end of the day to an empty House chamber -- and, more important, to a C-Span camera, and thus to cable-TV viewers in Houston. Lee also demanded scripts for the one-minute partisan presentations that members make at the start of the House's daily sessions.

It's not unusual for members to make such speeches, but Lee wanted to make one almost every day. As her term wore on, other members of Congress compared her to the kid in the Life cereal commercial: "She's like Mikey. Give it to Mikey, he eats anything. Give it to Sheila, she speaks on anything."

........most former employees interviewed by the Houston Press say they'd never repeat the experience.

"She is the boss from hell," says one former assistant, a young black woman. "She treats everybody like her slaves. To give you an idea of what I thought my [time] with Sheila was like, it was a slave plantation, and she was the master."

Meredith Jones, the aide commanded to produce an amendment in 30 minutes, won't discuss the specifics of her short employment by Lee, but Jones's resignation has become legend among the congresswoman's staff.

After 11 frustrating days on the job, Jones faced her office computer terminal, tapped out a letter of resignation and walked to the Capitol, where Lee was attending a Judiciary Committee meeting. Jones approached as her boss was asking a question, deposited her letter and walked away. For once, Lee was speechless.

Lee didn't bring a car to Washington and declined to lease one. Instead, she depended on her staff to get her around.

"She would give me a time to pick her up in the morning," remembers a former staffer. "You'd get there every morning, usually around nine, and you'd wait between 30 minutes to an hour. Just sitting there, doing nothing."

That petty humiliation particularly grated. "She'd ask you to be there at nine, waiting, summer, winter, spring," remembers another reluctant driver. "Then it would be ten o'clock and she would still not be there. You'd wait the longest time and she would still not be there .... If it was terribly cold or hot, you're sitting there in your suit, sweating in this metal oven. Or freezing."

More galling than the actual driving was Lee's attitude toward her drivers. "She just didn't care," says a former legislative assistant. "She'd come down an hour late and want you to open the door for her .... She's not cognizant of anybody except herself. Everything revolves around her."

Other members of Congress live in Lee's building, less than three short blocks from the Capitol. While waiting for Lee, her staffers watched other lawmakers walk out of the building, laughing and talking, drinking coffee and enjoying the short walk to work. Sometimes, after Lee finally appeared, she would offer rides to her pedestrian colleagues. Her drivers do not recall anyone ever accepting the offer.

---SNIP---

rest at http://www.houstonpress.com/news/rockets-try-to-extend-winning-streak-to-four-against-chris-pauls-former-team-1012158

"Looking at the maps of the districts, it’s pretty obvious to me that there are definite political or person motivations for the way many of them were drawn."

Well, duh!

But just because it's political doesn't mean it's illegal.

When exactly did “Mexican” become a race, anyway?

When exactly did “Mexican” become a race, anyway?

https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html

The U.S. Census Bureau must adhere to the 1997 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) standards on race and ethnicity which guide the Census Bureau in classifying written responses to the race question:

White – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.

Black or African American – A person having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa.

American Indian or Alaska Native – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America) and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.

Asian – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.

The 1997 OMB standards permit the reporting of more than one race. An individual’s response to the race question is based upon self-identification.

An individual’s response to the race question is based upon self-identification. The Census Bureau does not tell individuals which boxes to mark or what heritage to write in. For the first time in Census 2000, individuals were presented with the option to self-identify with more than one race and this continued with the 2010 Census. People who identify with more than one race may choose to provide multiple races in response to the race question. For example, if a respondent identifies as "Asian" and "White," they may respond to the question on race by checking the appropriate boxes that describe their racial identities and/or writing in these identities on the spaces provided.