Skip to comments.‘The 97% climate consensus’ starts to crumble with 485 new papers in 2017 that question it
Posted on 01/13/2018 3:02:35 PM PST by Helotes
A broad survey of climate change literature for 2017 reveals that the alleged consensus behind the dangers of anthropogenic global warming is not nearly as settled among climate scientists as people imagine. Author Kenneth Richard found that during the course of the year 2017, at
(Excerpt) Read more at wattsupwiththat.com ...
One of Al Gore’s global warming scientists was probably his speech therapist.
“Climate consensus” was top down political consensus
The globalist slush fund must be drying up.
If the ‘scientist’ don’t get their palms greased how are they going to fake their climate disruption malarkey?
Piltdown Man was a piker compared to these men of science.
I sure we see this on the news broadcasts. Someone should at least send it to Ivanka and Jared and Rex and last but not least carbon tax Gary Cohn.
This is all settled science. These 485 authors of papers suggesting otherwise are full of Bullshine. (/sarcasm)
That 97% thing is the biggest overuse of a statistic I’ve ever come across.
It’s not fair to use, even jokingly.
But, probably 97% of the people on the Global Warming bandwagon are useful idiots. The rest are grifters and con artists.
...as people imagine?
Thats because the enemedia treats the public like mushrooms...
They keep people in the Dark and feed them Bullshit.
The ‘enemedia’ are generally journalism majors, with little of no understanding of science of the majority of topics they report on. This is why they should concentrate on presenting the truth and stop trying to insert themselves into the news.
Blasphemy! How dare anyone commit Heresy against Environmental Doctrine! May High Priest Gore forgive us. [/sarc]
...or as Ronnie Milsap might sing..
...99 and 44/100 percent pure dung...
starts to crumble ???
It was crumby (crummy) from the beginning.
Ignaz Semmelweis was ridiculed by the establishment for suggesting that doctors wash their hands before delivering a baby. Despite evidence that it worked, doctors refused to do so because it went against the consensus of the time, and pathogens had not been discovered. Point being that being a contrarian even with evidence will make you a pariah in the scientific community.
John Casey’s book Dark Winter refutes the Anthropomorphic Global Warming (AGW) theory by documenting the 206 year grand solar minimum cycle. Clearly, the Sun has more to do with earth’s temperature than AGW. LOL
There was a Mad Magazine cartoon about 1965 that showed a neon advertising sign 99 44/100 PURE...but the “RE” was burned out. So it read “99 44/100% PU” which is so apropos for GW BS.
Herr Doktor Ignaz Semmelweis — poor guy had two strikes against him right there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.