Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

Lawyers for the states said they’re losing nearly $34 billion a year because of the physical presence rule, though estimates from the federal Government Accountability Office said the figure is much smaller.


A pet peeve of mine, is people saying that some entity of government, is “losing” money, due to an inability to tax some sort of activity.

This implies that somehow this money belongs to the government, and the government has an unalienable absolute right to tax absolutely everything.

Anyone agree? Anyone disagree, and think that government should calculate that they “lose x amount”, if something isn’t taxed, and then figure out a way to impose a new tax?


20 posted on 01/14/2018 9:43:43 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Your pet peeve peeves me similarly.


30 posted on 01/14/2018 10:01:33 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I agree.

It drives me bat-shit crazy to hear that expression.

It doesn't “cost” the government a damn thing. It distresses them to no end that the people, who ARE the government, are allowed to keep any portion of the fruits of their labor.

They are thieves.

32 posted on 01/14/2018 10:02:00 AM PST by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson