Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
The article, which was published by Yahoo on Sept. 23, 2016, was “cited extensively” in the application, which also notes that most of the information contained in the story was derived from the dossier.

Seems as though everybody does believe it, if it was on the internet.

20 posted on 02/04/2018 5:24:30 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: umgud

Reasoning from circular argument.

A logical fallacy which BTW, is the entire basis of the Russian collusion assertion.

The conclusion is also the premise, supported by no independent facts whatsoever.

IOW, it all made-up.


21 posted on 02/04/2018 5:27:18 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: umgud

And the dossier just appeared out of thin air! No FISA judge asked about the origin of the dossie, or where Isikoff got his information and/or how reliable it was ... just believed the fed attorneys.

THINK about the anger/disgust of the (Obama appointed) judge regarding the feds lying in the Bundy case. She read them the riot act. I wonder if she or anyone else has followed up with professional responsibility (ethics) grievances that could lead to suspension or disbarment of the fed attorneys.


66 posted on 02/05/2018 1:19:16 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson