Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Like Obama Never Left on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Townhall.com ^ | February 13, 2018 | Brian McNicoll

Posted on 02/13/2018 9:37:23 AM PST by Kaslin

It’s a story you would expect to have heard during the Obama administration.

Coal plants are closing across the country, largely because of market conditions and federal policies aimed at ending the use of coal in our country. One of these policies, the Clean Power Plan, proposed by President Obama as the United States’ principle initiative to meet the emissions targets of the Paris Climate Accords, had made it too expensive to keep coal plants open.

Wind, natural gas and, increasingly, solar energy are cleaner and becoming cheaper and more reliable. The Department of Energy, led by the administration’s token Texan, proposes spending a small amount of money to keep a few of these coal plants operational to fill the grid’s needs in times of emergency. And the regulators – appointees of the president – vote it down because they value the prospect of green energy over the certainty of coal.

But this is not a story from the Obama administration. It’s a story that is going on right now. The Department of Energy, headed by former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, proposed to keep retiring coal and nuclear power plants minimally online to make the grid more resilient overall and improve its ability to respond to fires, storms, disruptions and perhaps even cyber-attacks.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or FERC – on which three of the five members, including the chairman, are Trump appointees – did grant Perry’s general point and voted to “promptly decide whether additional Commission action is warranted to address grid resilience.”

It’s a story you would expect to have heard during the Obama administration.

Coal plants are closing across the country, largely because of market conditions and federal policies aimed at ending the use of coal in our country. One of these policies, the Clean Power Plan, proposed by President Obama as the United States’ principle initiative to meet the emissions targets of the Paris Climate Accords, had made it too expensive to keep coal plants open.

Wind, natural gas and, increasingly, solar energy are cleaner and becoming cheaper and more reliable. The Department of Energy, led by the administration’s token Texan, proposes spending a small amount of money to keep a few of these coal plants operational to fill the grid’s needs in times of emergency. And the regulators – appointees of the president – vote it down because they value the prospect of green energy over the certainty of coal.

But this is not a story from the Obama administration. It’s a story that is going on right now. The Department of Energy, headed by former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, proposed to keep retiring coal and nuclear power plants minimally online to make the grid more resilient overall and improve its ability to respond to fires, storms, disruptions and perhaps even cyber-attacks.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or FERC – on which three of the five members, including the chairman, are Trump appointees – did grant Perry’s general point and voted to “promptly decide whether additional Commission action is warranted to address grid resilience.”

But two of the Trump appointees – Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Robert Powelson – were pretty public in their efforts to join with the Democrats to end the rulemaking process Perry had launched.  The third Trump appointee, Commissioner Neil Chatterjee, got in line with the rest of the group once the writing was on the wall that the FERC was going to side against the administration.

McIntyre’s participation in this must be the most puzzling for the White House. He came to the commission from Jones Day, a conservative Washington D.C. law firm. Think Progress, the blog of the liberal Center for American Progress, claimed McIntyre had so many conflicts of interests from decades of representing fossil fuel companies that his swearing-in ceremony had to be delayed to give him time to unwind the relationships.

More surprisingly, Solyndra and other renewable energy crony capitalism schemes of the Obama administration were common elements of President Trump’s stump speeches, both on the campaign and since. But many of those same green energy cronies were all over the effort to scuttle this effort to keep baseload coal and nuclear plants online for use in keeping our power grid online and reliable. 

But two of the Trump appointees – Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Robert Powelson – were pretty public in their efforts to join with the Democrats to end the rulemaking process Perry had launched.  The third Trump appointee, Commissioner Neil Chatterjee, got in line with the rest of the group once the writing was on the wall that the FERC was going to side against the administration.

McIntyre’s participation in this must be the most puzzling for the White House. He came to the commission from Jones Day, a conservative Washington D.C. law firm. Think Progress, the blog of the liberal Center for American Progress, claimed McIntyre had so many conflicts of interests from decades of representing fossil fuel companies that his swearing-in ceremony had to be delayed to give him time to unwind the relationships.

More surprisingly, Solyndra and other renewable energy crony capitalism schemes of the Obama administration were common elements of President Trump’s stump speeches, both on the campaign and since. But many of those same green energy cronies were all over the effort to scuttle this effort to keep baseload coal and nuclear plants online for use in keeping our power grid online and reliable. 

One of the recipients of Bloomberg’s largesse, the Sierra Club’s “Beyond Coal” campaign said “FERC’s announcement is a return to reality after months of billionaire coal and nuclear executives pressuring DOE and FERC to illegally set up bailouts for their uneconomic plants.”

People are policy. Donald Trump won the election. His representatives to the various boards and agencies should reflect the same will as the people expressed in November 2016. He has said he wants to help coal country and understands its strategic place in the US energy mix. He has said he wants to expand not just coal but all U.S. energy exploration to provide jobs, promote growth through affordable energy and assure energy independence in our increasingly volatile world.

His appointees to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, unlike other agencies, are not following his lead. In fact, they are doing the bidding of his political adversaries and, in the process, leaving the nation more vulnerable to extensive energy outages.

Murray Energy, one of the nation’s leading coal producers, released a statement that read: “If it were not for the electricity generated by our nation’s coal-fired plants, and nuclear plants, we would be experiencing massive brownouts and blackouts in this country.”

That’s not true all the time. But what’s being argued here is not what happens all the time but rather what happens in emergencies. And given the U.S. has a 500-year supply of coal, it’s best to keep enough plants in operation to serve as a backbone in case the worst happens.  It is too bad that President Trump’s own nominees don’t recognize the importance of Trump’s vision.  


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: coal; energyandenvironment

1 posted on 02/13/2018 9:37:23 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"..solar energy are cleaner and becoming cheaper and more reliable."

Solar will never get to highly reliable. It's as obvious as night and day.

2 posted on 02/13/2018 9:42:32 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Before his political career, DJT was known for 2 words: "You're fired!"

It's time he start using those 2 words again.

3 posted on 02/13/2018 9:44:46 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why are coal miners going back to work in West Valley after Trump rescinded Obamas EO forcing their mines to shut down?

Something is bs with this story.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/16/coal-will-have-a-big-comeback/


4 posted on 02/13/2018 9:47:58 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15
Do you know what rescind means? Obviously you don't so I will tell you

Definition of rescind

1 : to take away : remove

2 a : take back, cancel refused to rescind the order 3 : to make void by action of the enacting authority or a superior authority : repeal rescind an act

This is exactly what President Trump did when he reopened the coal mines, which that arrogant former occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave closed.

5 posted on 02/13/2018 10:18:48 AM PST by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I know the meaning of rescinded and what’s the reason for the wise ass response? I don’t care to be talked down to by you or anyone else.

Next time you choose to respond to me do so in a civil manner or else STFU.


6 posted on 02/13/2018 10:38:42 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson