Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court To Have Closed-Door Meeting On DACA
thehill.com ^ | 02/16/18

Posted on 02/16/2018 7:46:10 AM PST by Helicondelta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: Helicondelta
The basic question before the court would be "does the United States of America have the right to have borders and,if so, does she have the right to *enforce* those borders?"

Or to put it another way..."Is there anyone on earth who doesn't have the right to claim US citizenship?"

81 posted on 02/17/2018 4:39:58 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama & Hillary: The Two Most Corrupt Politicians of My Lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

That’s inane. Why does someone always have to have something on someone? At some point, reading the same old tired post over and over, it gets ridiculous. Rolling my eyes.


82 posted on 02/17/2018 9:15:29 AM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Obama did have an EO called DACA.


83 posted on 02/17/2018 9:20:04 AM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dave W
DHS put out a memo. There is no record of a EO from trump or Obama with daca. Trump had his own memo.
84 posted on 02/17/2018 9:22:24 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Nice thought but it is not going to happen. It needs 60 votes in the Senate and that is not happening. I have been reading about splitting the 9th since the 80s. Nothing has happened and it won’t happen.


85 posted on 02/17/2018 9:23:40 AM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Sorry, about that but you are correct. I forgot about that. Interesting.


86 posted on 02/17/2018 9:25:50 AM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

.gov breaks the ‘law’ everyday. It’s hard to keep up.


87 posted on 02/17/2018 9:27:01 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

They have to restore some semblance of judical restraint. Its been forced on them to do this.


Yes it’s time


88 posted on 02/17/2018 12:53:09 PM PST by Syncro (Facts is facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace; All
DACA was not an EO. It was a policy memorandum issued by Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary, in June 2012.

Good to get to the source of the action.

Can you supply a link, or several links pertaining to this?

DACA is/was/still is an illegal and unconstitutional proclamation which never should have been put in place.

It completely goes against protecting our country.

Homeland Security should be making our homeland secure, not turning it over to illegal insurgent criminal invading colonists.

Ironic how the left is making policy.

Someone spoke of revolution.

It's not us, the patriotic citizens that will bring it on, but the corrupt and anti-American political blackmailing Deep State/Shadow government through their clandestine workings with the help of the most powerful political party in existence in this day and age, The Media.

Many think the Media is a branch of the Democrat party while the truth of the matter it is the opposite.

Democrats and their party are sycophants of the Media Political Party

89 posted on 02/17/2018 1:09:17 PM PST by Syncro (Facts is facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Unless/until Roberts fesses up to what info the Rats are using to blackmail him, I don’t expect much good from him.


90 posted on 02/17/2018 1:13:46 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Have an A-1 day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The SC already ruled against state meddling in immigration, in Arizona v US, when the governor proceeded to follow a local law that mimicked US immigration law. I don’t know how all these lower courts are getting around that recent ruling.


91 posted on 02/17/2018 1:20:40 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Supreme Court DACA ping


92 posted on 02/18/2018 12:52:12 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I think the meeting is about stopping these Federal Judges from playing their games with immigration.....forever. In other words, once the USSC rules, they cannot challenge it again and again which is what they have done.

One can only hope that a few SC Justice are angry and are going to clamp down on these wayward activist lower court Federal judges and issue a ruling that prevents their sabotage of Trump's legitimate Executive orders.

93 posted on 02/18/2018 12:59:03 AM PST by dennisw (The strong take from the weak, but the smart take from the strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

ping


94 posted on 02/19/2018 2:27:17 PM PST by dennisw (The strong take from the weak, but the smart take from the strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson