That is factually false. The legislature did indeed come up with a map. The governor didn't like it so the Court substituted their own map - highly questionable they had the authority to do such a thing - especially since they didn't even consider whether the new map the legislature implemented was constitutional simply because the governor didn't like it.
Like most progtards he has no idea what he's talking about, believing--laughably--that the Courts get to "step in when legislatures" don't "do their jobs."
First his claim is simply a lie. The legislature did draw a map. He and the other progtards didn't like it.
Second, when a legislature doesn't "do its job" the result is: nothing happens. Because in a lawful society, there is a separation of powers, and other branches of government don't get to usurp authority from each other when they're unsatisfied with the results.
That's the job of voters. NOT courts.