Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aimhigh

It’s not already against the law to provide everything?


9 posted on 02/19/2018 8:09:41 PM PST by wastedyears (Americans are dreamers too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastedyears

It’s not already against the law to provide everything?


Providing everything was the assumption prior to about 1980.

But the Supreme Court ruled that prosecutors have near absolute immunity, and judges were loathe to hold them to account.

Federal prosecutors really got out of hand. Many cite the case against Senator Stevens as a beginning, but it started quite a while before then.

The prosecutors focused on getting convictions, often for political gain, instead of fostering justice, as is their first purpose. It is as important for a prosecutor to *not* prosecute as it is to prosecute.

But with the explosion of vague federal criminal laws, nearly everyone can be found guilty of something. So *going after the man* instead of prosecuting a crime, became what many prosecutors did.

Judge Sullivan has become one of the few judges to make it his mission to reign in prosecutorial power about witholding Brady material.


16 posted on 02/19/2018 8:42:41 PM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson