??
But that doesn’t address the fact we have natural rights to refuse to associate...buy...sell...sit next to...with anyone.
You are saying the right to refuse to sell a gun to a buyer is a violation of 2A. That simply does not follow.
No. I am saying that the law that specifies the FFL right to refuse without cause is a violation of the constitution.
Without that law, the person who sells firearms retains his/her rights to refuse to do business with anyone. If those right run up against someone else’s rights, then that is a different issue.