Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGavin999

The districts were a mess. That said, the Dems created the mess. Republican control of the state house is a fairly new thing as the Dems have become the party of the big urban areas and not much else. Trump voters in many parts of PA have nothing in common with the Schumer/Pelosi party.

Lamb ran as a republican against a very weak candidate.....and still barely won. And he was going away regardless.


14 posted on 03/19/2018 1:24:42 PM PDT by PSUGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: PSUGOP

I don’t doubt that the old districts were a “mess” as you put it.

However, the Constitution does clearly state that they are to be drawn by THE STATE LEGISLATURE.

The PA Supreme Court is NOT the STATE LEGISLATURE.

In a case last year where Arizona turned redistricting over to a “bipartisan committee” (I believe via a ballot initiative) SCOTUS upheld that. You could make a case that was legislature by extension. But we’re on a slippery slope.


22 posted on 03/19/2018 1:31:15 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PSUGOP

But Lamb was SUPPOSED TO WIN by 5-6%. He is in limbo until after a recount and is only up by about a half of a percent. I CALL THAT BEING A LOSER, AS HE WAS SUPPOSED TO WIN BY 5-6%!


24 posted on 03/19/2018 1:31:44 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson