So, in essence, he wanted to create a martyr to a cause, so that martyr - himself - would become a new rallying point for it.
His self-centered arrogance about himself was already obvious in the legal arguments he used in the New Jersey case. New Jersey already had a civil partnership law and the “marriage” ruling altered nothing at all in terms of essential protections for a “gay” couple. Like all similar rulings it was not about “protections” for the persons in the civil partnership, it was about using law to mandate social acceptance. From those rulings “education” has drawn cause to incorporate that mandate of social acceptance into the curriculum. It all, in a deep sense, is not about freedom and Liberty but a denial of freedom of Liberty for everyone who disagrees with the idea that their thought be corrected, in accordance with the law.
Excellent. We’ll said!
Yep. Some people are so intolerant of others’ point of views that they’ll resort to killing. In this case I’m glad it was suicide instead of homicide.