Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fido969

Nope.

Using the proposed county groupings for NorCal, Cal, and SoCal in the initiative, and using the 2016 Presidential election results as a proxy of how each state would vote for a Senator, we would end up with 6 Kamala Harris type Progressives in the Senate. And while some are hoping that this measure might strip off some Electoral votes for the GOP candidate, that won’t happen either - in fact the Dems would end up with 4 more EVs.

2016 Presidential Election results by proposed “3Cal Split”:

Nor Cal: Clinton 3,402,343 - Trump 1,464,637
Cal: Clinton 2,934,624 - Trump 1,057,331
So Cal: Clinton 2,413,666 - Trump 1,957,594


33 posted on 04/16/2018 10:25:49 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Task 1: Accomplished, Task 2: Hold them Accountable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: So Cal Rocket

The only real solution is a 2-state solution that others have proposed - LA and SF in one state along the coast, all of the inland portions, northern and southern counties as another state.


37 posted on 04/16/2018 10:34:12 AM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson