Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pugmama

If no money changed hands then Cohen is not his lawyer. You are not protected by privilege in that case. This has been fairly clear in the past that random conversations are not covered because there has to be a paid retainer.


100 posted on 04/16/2018 2:12:11 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: ClayinVA

I guess I was wrong according to other posters. I may be thinking about Divorce law and making sure your ex does not use your lawyer.


104 posted on 04/16/2018 2:17:47 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: ClayinVA
If no money changed hands then Cohen is not his lawyer. You are not protected by privilege in that case. This has been fairly clear in the past that random conversations are not covered because there has to be a paid retainer.

If that is the case then what business does the judge have forcing Cohen's lawyers to reveal the names of people he has had random conversations with? And why are the judge and Cohen's lawyers referring to Hannity as a client?

113 posted on 04/16/2018 2:36:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson