Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mueller's former assistant says grammatical errors prove leaked questions came from Trump
The Hill ^ | May 1, 2018 | BROOKE SEIPEL

Posted on 05/01/2018 8:11:31 AM PDT by BurgessKoch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: FrankR

LOL! Well done!


41 posted on 05/01/2018 11:30:16 AM PDT by free-in-nyc (Freeping from the heart of the anti-American phony "resistance")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Fake News CNN


42 posted on 05/01/2018 2:04:19 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Pure nonsense they are exactly questions that could be asked.


43 posted on 05/01/2018 2:10:20 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“The short answer to all of muellers possible questions, ‘no comment’. Through the lawyer.”

I don’t know...part of me hopes that the answer to each question is F-— You.


44 posted on 05/01/2018 2:14:03 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch
I didn't think that the President would **** on the failing New York Times if it was on fire.

So he gave them an exclusive scoop?

45 posted on 05/01/2018 2:15:30 PM PDT by Sooth2222 (Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

It was pulled out of CNN’s butt. Who would to retype that.


46 posted on 05/01/2018 2:21:18 PM PDT by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Didn’t the NYT confirm the Qs came from a source outside the White House? (aka Mueller’s crew


47 posted on 05/01/2018 2:32:07 PM PDT by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Fake News.


48 posted on 05/01/2018 2:39:33 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
Stormy Daniels and Robert Mueller - two prostitutes working towards the same goal.

Yep, and they're both gonna get F**KED.

49 posted on 05/01/2018 2:44:51 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Is Zeldin a typical example of the brain power Mueller has working for him? LOL


50 posted on 05/01/2018 2:50:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I disagree with the logic here, because NYT could have mangled actual questions into it's news report, regardless of where the actual questions came from (if they are actual Mueller team proposed questions).

What bad grammar? Where are the mistakes in the Times report? I don't see any. For Zeldin to be correct the paper would have had to fix up errors when they published the article.

I do see some questionable usage of commas, but it's not something that lawyers or reporters absolutely would never do. And there's some "with whom." If Trump is so illiterate would he really know how to use "whom"?

But of course the idea that Trump himself would personally leak the questions isn't believable. If somebody else in the White House did leak the questions, why would they necessarily be less literate than Mueller's staff or the Times staffers?

This is the age of cut and paste. If you get the list of questions and want to pass it on, you can probably just cut and paste them from one document to another. So where do errors come into the picture?

And it's not just cut and paste for the recipient of the questions. It's cut and paste for the lawyers who drafted them, too. The questions weren't some great and eloquent work of art. It's "What did you think ... ," "Was the purpose of ...," "What was the purpose of ...," "What did you know ...," over and over again. If there are mistakes in grammar, it's probably because they had all those beginnings of questions and cut and pasted them with the second half of the question (the thing they were asking about).

So I don't think there's much credibility to the story.

51 posted on 05/01/2018 2:53:12 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LS
"More likely Maggot Haberman of the NYT to avoid talking about Iran."

_____________

LOL ....

52 posted on 05/01/2018 2:55:49 PM PDT by a little elbow grease (Zip ties and duct tape are far more productive than pussy hats and #metoo tweets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

During Plamegate prosecutors tried to assure us Scooter Libby was the source of leaks...


53 posted on 05/01/2018 3:01:52 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ads for Chappaquiddick warn of scenes of tobacco use. What about the hazards of drunk driving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Well I was looking over the questions from an earlier report here and the questions looked like a dumb lawyer wrote them..


54 posted on 05/01/2018 3:06:53 PM PDT by Davy Crocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

or “for my next trick, I’m gonna let this pencil disappear..TADA!!” (The Joker)


55 posted on 05/01/2018 3:14:31 PM PDT by max americana (Fired libtard employees 9 consecutive times at every election since 08'. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

So grammar is like a signature? I suppose... but anyone can insert grammatical errors to make it look like it came from someone else.


56 posted on 05/01/2018 3:14:51 PM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Then perhaps they would be interested in the grammatical analysis of 0vomit’s supposed book. Analysis by an EXPERT says that it was NOT written by 0vomit and was most likely written by Ayers.

That is based on FAR MORE evidence and a much greater level of expertise.


57 posted on 05/01/2018 3:27:04 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch
“Because of the way these questions are written ... lawyers wouldn’t write questions this way, in my estimation. Some of the grammar is not even proper," he continued.

Some of the worst grammar I've seen has been written by lawyers.

58 posted on 05/01/2018 3:47:39 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

Figures, they leak the crap then say oh it was written by a dummy so Trump must have written it..such a-holes


59 posted on 05/01/2018 4:00:23 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The first hour of Mark Levin is going to replay at 9pm est and he is saying Mueller leaked this as part of his grounds for impeachment of Trump.


60 posted on 05/01/2018 4:03:23 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson