So this case seems to conflict with the federal judge that ruled DACA must continue, including accepting new applicants.
Assuming this judge rules against DACA, how will this play out against the ruling by the other judge?
Apparently liberals have their judges and we have ours...
So the several states are subject to/must comply with illegal Executive Orders?
Dont assume that this judges decision will be favorable. I am sure that the left is doing its opposition research right now to blackmail this judge.
This judge already Ruled DAPA, the second illegal amnesty for illegal aliens by the illegal President, was illegal.
If DAPA has no basis in law then neither does DACA.
Blatant over reach by the Kenyanesian Usurper that he himself said repeatedly he could not do, until he did it.
Better than the judge, the states have lawyers that want to win. Based on my reading of the other case, the feds have incompetent lawyers that set up their case to lose. The judge in the other case seemed to bend over backwards to try and tell them how to present a winning case, which they have not done. Sessions needs to make sure he and his attorneys are competent and actually want to win they cases they are given.
Support Free Republic, Folks!
Then someone sequester him at the closest Army Base before he is “Scalia’d” ..