Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford And The Folly Of Federal Fuel Economy Mandates
IBD ^ | 05/04/2018

Posted on 05/04/2018 7:25:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

It's been a bad couple of weeks for environmentalists who want to force Americans into battery-powered econoboxes. First, the Trump administration said it will likely freeze fuel economy standards. Then Ford announced plans to drop most of its passenger cars in favor of trucks and SUVs. Both are good news for consumers.

By 2020, Ford (F) says the only cars in its lineup in North America will be the Mustang and a new Focus. Automobile Magazine's New York bureau chief Jamie Lincoln Kitman complained in a New York Times op-ed that the decision means a "decade's worth of investment in developing more fuel-efficient cars is now taking a back seat to profit."

Actually, Ford is simply acknowledging what car buyers have been telling the company for some time now — that they are far more interested in larger utility vehicles than sedans and compact cars.

In the first quarter of this year, SUVs, vans and trucks accounted for almost 80% of Ford's sales, and passenger car sales dropped by almost 14% year-over-year.

Industrywide, utility vehicles accounted for more than 60% of sales in Q1.

Ford and other carmakers dropping or scaling back their small car lines are simply responding to consumer demand. Which is what they are supposed to do.

CAFE Nonsense

The second bit of "bad" news came when the Trump administration's EPA said it was planning to freeze federal "corporate average fuel economy" (CAFE) standards at 2020 levels, rather than let them continue to climb until 2025.

The "explanatory" news site Vox.com, for example, complains that if successful Trump will "bequeath America vehicles that guzzle more gas, have higher fuel costs, produce more pollution, and profit the dirtiest automakers."

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ford; fuelmandates

1 posted on 05/04/2018 7:25:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Jamie Lincoln Kitman complained in a New York Times op-ed that the decision means a "decade's worth of investment in developing more fuel-efficient cars is now taking a back seat to profit."

Sooo... How many more decades do you want them to go on ignoring the preferences of the customers? I know this is a difficult concept forLiberals, but businesses actually exist TO MAKE MONEY. They actually have a legal obligation to try their best to do so, or else they are failing their investors, and can face legal consequences if they screw it up badly enough.

Not every person or business entity exists to help you enforce your Utopian pipe dreams, Jamie.

2 posted on 05/04/2018 7:29:27 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Predictable Liberal Response: Then we need to manipulate consumer demand by imposing a Carbon Tax or somesuch.


3 posted on 05/04/2018 7:29:34 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It was all meant to stultify the populace.............


4 posted on 05/04/2018 7:29:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (Remember all the great work Obama did for the black community?.............. Me neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’d buy a big ol’ slush box sedan if they still made them.


5 posted on 05/04/2018 7:36:30 AM PDT by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrats own the battery industry?


6 posted on 05/04/2018 7:38:03 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Actually, Ford is simply acknowledging what car buyers have been telling the company for some time now — that they are far more interested in larger utility vehicles than sedans and compact cars."

And frankly they are following the business model of Fiat Chrysler America if you look at it.

What I have read and or told ( non proprietary ) by my auto gnomes.

* Car type(s) are faddish, look at what has disappeared: The personal luxury car ( the Monte Carlo ), The Mini-Van rage is over, The Station Wagon, and you can name more, have all come and gone.

The new customer rages are: sitting up higher, room, and room for my stuff, and can "it" carry all our kids, their sports stuff and their friends and their stuff too.

CUV's SUV's do that.

A four Door Camary or Accord don't cut it and one of them I can't remember which is not selling.

Don't blame Trump, don't blame, bla bla bla, for once the consumers needs will be addressed without the CEO's of the big three wondering when he who shall not be named will use the power of three letter organizations against them.

I stand alone here on FR and I still say we are this close to an "E-Car" revolution and it will happen in the 2 terms of President Donald J. Trump and springboard the economy and the GDP under his watch even further. The 1st wave of them are here in 2020, 4 door Electric 4wd SUV's with "skateboard" ( under the floorboard ) battery packs with range up to 250 miles per charge. That is once a week if you do 50 miles a day as a busy mom running the kids around in it. If they steal sports suspension pieces from their parts bin, and w/ the low C.G. and 4WD it might handle quite nice and be fun to drive.

7 posted on 05/04/2018 8:16:41 AM PDT by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Insane government fuel efficiency standards made Ford chose not make cars anymore.


8 posted on 05/04/2018 8:19:46 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Jamie would have all of us driving Trabants.


9 posted on 05/04/2018 8:22:56 AM PDT by henkster (Monsters from the Id.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
I stand alone here on FR and I still say we are this close to an "E-Car" revolution and it will happen in the 2 terms of President Donald J. Trump and springboard the economy and the GDP under his watch even further. The 1st wave of them are here in 2020, 4 door Electric 4wd SUV's with "skateboard" ( under the floorboard ) battery packs with range up to 250 miles per charge. That is once a week if you do 50 miles a day as a busy mom running the kids around in it. If they steal sports suspension pieces from their parts bin, and w/ the low C.G. and 4WD it might handle quite nice and be fun to drive.

You're alone alright. Until they can recharge the vehicle in 10 minutes or less, electric cars are just toys for idiots who buy the global warming bullshite.

I've thought for years that a diesel-electric hyrbid like that used in locomotives is really the way to go if you're interested in fuel economy, reliability, and durability. Unfortunately, leftists have been brainwashed against diesel.

10 posted on 05/04/2018 10:16:10 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
And I am ok with that. I have watched Venture Capital go from 500 million to 1 billion in the last 2 years backing the miracle battery companies. BTW I lost track of all of them, their are over 20 and they include Solid State Batteries, unique electrolytes ( Store-Dot from Israel w/ a Bio-peptide aka stomach acid to get the battery to charge in 5 minutes for 250 miles range ) and the energy density of these start ups are in the arena of 1.5x to 5x where we are now,and yes reducing charge times.

As I said, many are trying to get the charge time down as well, and that is not without it's challenges aka extreme voltages / amperage to make it happen and literately water cooled charging systems, I have seen them on display.

FWIW, one of my gnomes noted those in the biz get it that this paradigm shift is coming, and to get aboard it or maybe it is time to retire.

On Diesels. I got to see the Prototype "Achates" opposed piston engine in a F-150 @ the NAIAS and spoke w/ the rep ( acutally an engineer ) on it. What was amazing beyond the potential of it springboarding to a 34 mpg vehicle w/ 480 lbs of torque out of 2.7l and 270hp that it was a Compression Ignition Engine Utilizing Gasoline I am still wrapping my head around that one, that is almost HCCI....

11 posted on 05/04/2018 11:01:04 AM PDT by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
I stand alone here on FR

Well, no. Don't sprain yourself, lol.

12 posted on 05/04/2018 11:10:47 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Until they can recharge the vehicle in 10 minutes or less, electric cars are just toys for idiots who buy the global warming bullshite.

For a typical commuter, plugging in overnight works very nicely and the range on full charge is a nonissue for running around town on errands during lunch or on the way home in the evening. This is a large market by itself.

13 posted on 05/04/2018 11:13:07 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
As I said, many are trying to get the charge time down as well, and that is not without it's challenges aka extreme voltages / amperage to make it happen and literately water cooled charging systems, I have seen them on display.

I've seen some calculations regarding what it would take electrically to pump a battery as fast as it is necessary for it to be more than a commuter car that gets charged nightly. I sure as hell wouldn't want to stand near one of those things as it dumped that charge.

On Diesels. I got to see the Prototype "Achates" opposed piston engine in a F-150 @ the NAIAS and spoke w/ the rep ( acutally an engineer ) on it. What was amazing beyond the potential of it springboarding to a 34 mpg vehicle w/ 480 lbs of torque out of 2.7l and 270hp that it was a Compression Ignition Engine Utilizing Gasoline I am still wrapping my head around that one, that is almost HCCI....

Sounds interesting. Past time for more work on this idea IMO

14 posted on 05/04/2018 11:14:08 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
LOL! all right everyone is a comedian here ! ;-)
15 posted on 05/04/2018 11:50:00 AM PDT by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson