[Alberta's Child]

The Washington Post claimed Nunes was looking for information on an FBI/DOJ ‘source’: “a U.S. citizen who has provided intelligence to the CIA and FBI.” Additionally, this “source” was later also described by WaPo as a witness for Robert Mueller’s ongoing investigation.

Here's what I don't understand about all this controversy about this "source":

If this person is a witness in Mueller's investigation, then anyone who is facing a criminal charge by Mueller has a right to call this "source" as a witness for the defense in the criminal trial. Am I missing something here, or does the DOJ's refusal to identify this "source" effectively immunize anyone against criminal prosecution related to this matter?

[a little elbow grease]

If this person is a witness in Mueller's investigation, then anyone who is facing a criminal charge by Mueller has a right to call this "source" as a witness for the defense in the criminal trial. Am I missing something here,

___________________________

...........no, I don't think you are missing something. (You seldom miss anything.)

;-)

[a little elbow grease]

does the DOJ's refusal to identify this "source" effectively immunize anyone against criminal prosecution related to this matter?

___________________________

I do not know.... but I call on others.