Posted on 05/11/2018 7:43:28 AM PDT by Hojczyk
>> Look up the legal definition of treason <<
We don’t need no stinkin’ legal definition. We’ll just define it however we feel today.
That is, lean back and enjoy the thread!
Halper.
>> Halper is the outside coordinator. <<
Insider? Outsider?
What difference, at this point, does it make?
I mean, blogsters like Sundance need to generate clicks and thereby increase ad revenue. So any kind of controversial stuff is OK, logical or not.
President Trump knows what he is doing He will probably wait until he has MAXIMUM results to order it's release. You know like this September! The dem's will have NO WAY to make this go away before the Mid-terms, and they get Crushed in the election!
On Hannity’s show, Sara Carter brought up the possibility of an FBI informant in Trump’s campaign. The more I hear how rotten and pervasive the forces are against President Trump, the more it seems like this was a near coup. Hillary would have finished the job, but she lost, so the progressives are trying to get Trump out so the takeover of our country can be complete.
“I now think there will be at least one person executed for treason.”
I don’t see it happening, but it would be nice, as the one side benefit I foresee is that Big Media would DROP EVERYTHING ELSE to defend the traitor.
This is the biggest scandal, and story, in the history of USA politics.
Watergate was tidlywinks, compared to this.
This. Is. Huge.
It was a setup, right from the start. The Insurance Policy. John Brennan sent a mole into the Trump Campaign, sent him to various useful nobodies, to establish contact. Then used the contact information to start a counterintellegence investagation against Trump.
They got the FISA warrents, and spied on everyone anywhere near the useful nobodies. Everyone in the campaign. Likely congressmen. Probably Sessions.
All a setup.
Brennan.
Bizarre. Where did that come from?
I think we should also be open to the possibility that some of these people — I’m thinking Carter Page, Paul Manafort, and Michael Cohen (and maybe even Gen. Flynn) — had nefarious intentions from the start when they began working for the Trump campaign.
As I recall, the talk was that the GOPe was going to use Cruz and Kasich to force a brokered convention, after which in subsequent rounds they could sneak in anybody they wanted. The fear was that any convention shenanigans would infuriate Trump's base and they wouldn't support the inserted candidate, which would serve the deep state interests to elect Hillary Clinton.
The problem would have been solved right then and there. Why create this Rube Goldberg scheme after Trump won if the culprit is Manafort and he could have just stayed out of it back then and likely get the same result?
-PJ
It's also worth noting that Michael Caputo, who issued his epic rant against the Mueller witch hunt last week, was the one who pushed to have Manafort replace Corey Lewandowski as Trump's campaign manager.
Both Manafort and Caputo have had extensive dealings with foreign clients -- including Russian ones -- over the years. I won't make any unfounded accusations here, but I would have no trouble believing that their work in the Trump campaign was being done on behalf of foreign interests.
Considering all the underhanded tactics being used against him, it’s amazing he won!
Why get involved in those few critical months at all when he could have stayed out of it and let the GOPe do it's thing at the convention?
Why "save" Trump's candidacy if it was always Manafort's intention to take him out later if he won?
-PJ
We need to create an offense of “perfidious” (not “treason”). /s
Some people are talking about an FBI informant planted inside the campaign. Other people are talking about a person outside the campaign, who facilitated directing certain actors (who are in the campaign) to take certain actions. Distinguishing between these actors is helpful because some articles talk about the the inside FBI person, which can't be Halper because he was never inside. But Halper may be a pivotal player in the scheme.
Casual observers new to the news reports may not understand that general scheme, and might accidentally conflate the parties, looking for THE name.
That's the only difference it makes.
We already have an offense called perfidy -- although I guess it's not yet a federal crime.
But should it be added to the criminal code?
Dunno. We report, you decide.
May you ever be faithful, FRiend!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.