Posted on 05/13/2018 8:33:49 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
Why should Trump fire him? What have we learned since this began? (1)That corrupt US intel officials worked closely with foreign intel officials to attempt to destroy Trump. (2) The leadership of the fBI was corrupt. (3) The leadership of the Department of Justice was corrupt. (4) The DNC was both corrupt and inept. (5)Hillary Clinton and her cabal were corrupt. (6) The Clinton Foundation was utterly corrupt. (7) That two former FBI Directors are corrupt. (8) That the American media is easily corrupted. (9) That the mainstream media cannot and should not be trusted and that it will turn a blind eye to corruption. (10) That there is very little honor in the Senate. That’s just a start, and I’m sure you can think of more. It does, however, indicate that no matter how slowly the swamp is being drained.
Muler ( Myooooler)is part of an extended crime syndicate of liberal fascists at the DOJ and the FBI who want to gather evidence for impeachment , betting that democrats will win the HOuse in November. That’s his true motivation.
Muler is getting desperate because he can find no evidence of impeachable offenses by PDJT , nor can he get Flynn, Mannafort or Cohen to fabricate evidence either, which is why all the hoopla. Muler is desperate and doesn’t care about the law.
Mueler needs to be arrested and prosecuted along with Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Brennan, Clapper, Hillary Clinton, and others. Use the RICO statute to do it.
Muleface has deep state dirt on his hands. The only way he gets out of it....is to make the appearance he is the high minded, above the fray, interested in justice guy. When this is over....and someday it will be over.....Mule will walk away quietly. Unlike Comey who keeps opening his mouth and has basically pissed everyone off.
The fall elections is what he is slow peddling for. If the blue wave emerges, he doesn’t have to do anything....Dems will impeach....and he can walk away. If it doesn’t, he knows Trump is untouchable and will walk away. This is theater, not an investigation. Basketball without a shot clock.
There are real investigations going on.....Mule has a stay out of jail free card.
I see your bid and I'll raise you:
Mueller is exercising as broad an investigatory power as has ever been seen before -- and he continues to fail, but Trump will use this precedent to open the floodgates into Deep State/Shadow government exposure, going anywhere his investigators want as they build their cases for 4 existing criminal probes and already impaneled Grand Juries.
FReegards!
1. I hope Judge Ellis reads the WSJ. It truly would be great if he tossed out everything Mannafort prior to July 2016.
2. Anyone who thinks Trump wants the Mueller investigation to continue is delusional. Trump most definitely wants it to end, as do most rational Trump supporters.
3. Rush’s theory was about why Trump doesn’t declassify things, not why doesn’t he fire Mueller. Rush prefaced it, with (paraphrasing) I don’t know why he doesn’t declassify, it is very puzzling. He should. But there are some theories, and I don’t know...one is...etc. (Rush is in favor of declassifying)
4. If Trump could fire Mueller with little political cost, he would in a heartbeat. He’s likely constantly weighing it every day.
5. Nobody knows why he won’t declassify, but he seems to be heading in that direction...again, he is probably weighing that every day, and getting very mixed advice.
Still doesn't justify something unconstitutional. There are other - legal - ways to hold politicians accountable. Of course most of these require the Washington insiders to actually do the jobs they were elected or appointed to accomplish, and I recognize that's ultimately your point.
Mule has a stay out of jail free card.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
PDJT is taunting him. And I believe he will overstep to the point where he will be indicted.He is already in violation of Supreme Court law.
Mueller has so much power, he can indict Russian companies that don’t even exist.
“Scalia was right. The statute is unconstitutional.”
And that just confirmed what this investigation is all about. The left is trying to turn the constitution on its head. This may be about something completely different, like the states that are pooling their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.
Justice will prevail, of course... because whoever wins becomes the justice. That is fine for a banana republic. Rule of men, rather than rule of law.
Be still my heart, someone actually is injected sound reason into this runaway circus train. We cannot have unelected people accountable to unelected people running amuck in our justice system.
Mueller crosses the legal line
judges who are evil
The optimistic “glass is half full” attitude on new Trump appointees doesn’t work when many, many rotten judges are all over the place. Try enforcing immigration laws or making a presidential executive order sometime. Trump can’t, usually.
And locally the rulings in favor of little BLM and LGBT and pro-abortion judges are upheld by the district above them.
Then people say “It will take a few months or years for that ruling to work its way to the Supreme Court.” Where is the “justice” in all that?
Pelosi will be appointed to the Supreme Court by that time. (Sorry if you spilled your cup of coffee over that thought.)
>
Mr. Rosenstein could legally have brought all the indictments Mr. Mueller has. But he may not delegate that authority to Mr. Mueller, any more than President Trump could delegate his veto power to Mr. Rosenstein
>
Better watch that now. That logic, correctly so (IMO), could negate any # of Congressional ‘law’
Federal Reserve
Dept\Agency of XYZ
Anywhere that Congress has delegated its rightful power to an non-elected bureaucratic machine (IE: Only Congress can make Law; but we have rules\reg w/ the FORCE of law...Using the spirit of law to break law).
No, we don't know that. Clintons are criminals, but the Starr investigation was constitutionally dubious and a dangerous precedent. Ken Starr himself testified that the Independent Counsel law should expire.
Scalia's dissent in Morrison v Olson:
“Under our system of government, the primary check against prosecutorial abuse is a political one,” Justice Scalia wrote. “The prosecutors who exercise this awesome discretion are selected and can be removed by a president, whom the people have trusted enough to elect. Moreover, when crimes are not investigated and prosecuted fairly, non-selectively, with a reasonable sense of proportion, the president pays the cost in political damage to his administration.”
But there is no such political check, he went on, when “an independent counsel is selected, and the scope of his or her authority prescribed, by a panel of judges. What if they are politically partisan, as judges have been known to be, and select a prosecutor antagonistic to the administration, or even to the particular individual who has been selected for this special treatment? There is no remedy for that, not even a political one.”
He'd best stay away from the DC cherry trees, and angry Deplorables with hemp neckties...
Yeah, there is - and The Swamp is going to find out to its chagrin exactly what that remedy is.
Too bad it will be just about the last "life lesson" that they'll learn before they're involuntarily enrolled in the Nouveau Spandau Ballet...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.