Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting - another establishment lawyer (and a top SCOTUS appellate lawyer) is showing Trump the end game.
1 posted on 05/20/2018 7:31:33 PM PDT by CWW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CWW

“Trump”, not Trum”.


2 posted on 05/20/2018 7:32:52 PM PDT by CWW (Pray for God's Protection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

Thank you, Ted!


4 posted on 05/20/2018 7:36:17 PM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hoosiermama

Ping!


6 posted on 05/20/2018 7:39:07 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

Please do not alter the original title. It causes duplicate postings when the OP searches on it. Thanks.


7 posted on 05/20/2018 7:40:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

It’s hard for me to imagine Ted Olsen would be unbiased enough to give this take on the situation. His arguments pretty much inflicted ‘gay marriage’ on every state, overturning state amendments by the federal government. He must be able to look himself in the mirror, I guess.

Freegards


9 posted on 05/20/2018 7:45:54 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW
At this point, the judge would probably require Mueller to show precisely what he wants from the president, why he needs it, why he cannot get the evidence elsewhere, and the importance of that evidence to a specific prosecution. Mueller would have to be highly specific and show that his need for the president’s testimony as a witness—not for the purpose of discovery—was necessary to prosecute specific criminal acts.

Not for the purpose of discovery, yes, that's part of the issue, and the other part is not to attempt to trick the President into statements that do not match evidence that is already in hand but not disclosed to the court. No perjury traps allowed.

All this assumes that Mueller's word is good on both topics, and in fact it isn't good on any topic. He is a known liar who isn't at all above misrepresenting his intentions here. I wouldn't advise Trump to dignify this idiot charade with his presence.

14 posted on 05/20/2018 7:51:01 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

I think we Freepers should make a petition to Congress or whomever and demand an end to this bsw.


26 posted on 05/20/2018 8:22:46 PM PDT by jmacusa ("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

Er ...doesn’t there have to be evidence of a crime to compel anyone to testify about anything?j


29 posted on 05/20/2018 9:49:49 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW
A prosecutor would have to present the CRIME to the grand jury.

Didn't you notice that to date no one has charged Trump with a crime?

QUESTION TO CWW What do think the grand jury would do?

32 posted on 05/20/2018 10:16:49 PM PDT by Rapscallion (Mueller leads a conspiracy to frame the President. Stand by Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

So, he feels Mueller’s interview isn’t a good idea, but for whom is he truly concerned...Trump or swamp dwellers?


35 posted on 05/21/2018 4:52:06 AM PDT by polymuser (Its terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged today. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

36 posted on 05/21/2018 5:04:06 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Marxism: Wonderful theory, wrong species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson