Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

From an evolutionary standpoint, it makes sense. Women had to bond together and make a home in their cave that they lived in while men went on hunting trips. It is not advantageous for a man to be gay because obviously he will remove himself from the gene pool.


90 posted on 05/23/2018 6:10:21 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: MinorityRepublican
It is not advantageous for a man to be gay because obviously he will remove himself from the gene pool.

In a matrilocal group (the women stay with the tribe, women's mates move in) having sons be gay can have advantages for the tribe. A heterosexual son, once grown, is going to move out and join another tribe when he finds a mate, while a homosexual son will be more likely to stay with the tribe and promote the survival of his sister's kids.

Feminism may act to increase the "gayness" of society.

91 posted on 05/23/2018 8:50:38 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson