Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump demands 'total transparency' on FBI 'spygate' ahead of Thursday meeting
Washington Examiner ^ | May 23, 2018

Posted on 05/23/2018 10:02:27 AM PDT by deplorableindc

President Trump demanded "total transparency" Wednesday ahead of a meeting between top law enforcement officials and congressional Republicans demanding Russia probe documents.

"They'll all be in the room tomorrow. We'll see what happens. I want total transparency," Trump said on the South Lawn of the White House. "You have to have transparency."

On Monday, Trump tasked chief of staff John Kelly with organizing a meeting between FBI, Justice Department, and intelligence community representatives to provide congressional Republicans documents on an FBI informant linked to the Trump campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coup; deepstate; doj; fbi; spygate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

FreeRepublic is turning into an open sewer.


21 posted on 05/23/2018 10:43:28 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: deplorableindc

That Rosenstein will not be attending the meeting is interesting.


22 posted on 05/23/2018 10:44:23 AM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

As long as Rosenstein is allowing Mueller free rein to maximally damage Trump &co it doesn’t matter.


23 posted on 05/23/2018 10:44:55 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

I agree with you on all points. A few delusional sessions supporters would like to promulgate the fiction that him leaving is total catastrophe. Personally things would improve markedly with a real AG like DeGenova in charge.


24 posted on 05/23/2018 10:46:28 AM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker

We are on the same page. If there’s any way DiGenova could be confirmed, he is far and away my first pick as a Sessions replacement.

+1


25 posted on 05/23/2018 10:49:52 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal
They are standing in line waiting to be subpoena'd by congress.

Yes, I saw the bit about subpoenas. But I'd like to see your link indicating a line of FBI whistle blower agents waiting in line to testify against criminal deep state. Btw, sounds great and it looks like one agent has already come forward and it appears he did so without being subpoenaed.

26 posted on 05/23/2018 10:53:38 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: damper99

And Rosenstink would be bluffing. That pathetic charge wouldn’t stick in public opinion and never in court.


27 posted on 05/23/2018 11:27:54 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

According to DiGenova a few days ago, he said WH Chief of Staff Kelley warned both Rosenstein and Sessions their jobs are not secure. I’ve always predicted in any case Rosenstein will be gone by January of next year or sooner.


28 posted on 05/23/2018 11:33:55 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thanks for the information. DiGenova is a Trump confidant, so the scuttle probably came straight from POTUS. Right now all I’d need to be happy on the political front would be Rosenstein’s departure. I hope we don’t have to wait until January for it.


29 posted on 05/23/2018 11:40:17 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

DiGenova on the Laura Ingraham radio show.

May 15th
12 Minute vid.

“DiGenova: Rosenstein & Sessions Have Been Told ‘Your Jobs Are Not Secure’ “

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnyDAUYgP3w


30 posted on 05/23/2018 12:04:15 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thanks for the link!


31 posted on 05/23/2018 12:14:22 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Between looking at porn, they are sitting at their computer screens figuring out their pension benefits and timing of their retirement. After all, they are government “workers”.


32 posted on 05/23/2018 1:25:18 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter; Cboldt

If Rosenstein was fired or quit, I assume his Mueller “scope” memos would remain in effect?


33 posted on 05/23/2018 2:37:50 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
-- If Rosenstein was fired or quit, I assume his Mueller "scope" memos would remain in effect? --

Not necessarily. The new boss could interpret the scope differently, and reassign out of scope cases away from SC to USA.

34 posted on 05/23/2018 2:44:57 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose
Sessions has threatened to quit if the President fires Rosenslime.

This is what is known as a two-for.

35 posted on 05/23/2018 2:48:44 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

“Sessions has threatened to quit if the President fires Rosenslime.”

I’m okay with that sequence of events. Besides, how would anyone know he’d quit?

L


36 posted on 05/23/2018 2:51:53 PM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Yes, I meant temporarily. And it might take longer than we think to get a replacement confirmed by RINOs and Dems. In fact, in the hearings quite a few senators would ask if the nominee would preserve the “investigation” intact.


37 posted on 05/23/2018 3:11:54 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

From what I have read you are right. Rosenstein was taking no chances. He has granted Mueller near absolute power. How that gets undone at this point I couldn’t tell you.


38 posted on 05/23/2018 3:16:01 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Here’s an excerpt re how difficult it would be to rein Mueller’s hyena pack in:

Mueller team’s special status could save Virginia Manafort case

By JOSH GERSTEIN 05/21/2018 06:10 AM EDT

An obscure special status obtained by several of special counsel Robert Mueller’s attorneys could prevent a judge from ousting Mueller’s lawyers from their role in the prosecution of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in federal court in Virginia.

Several court filings indicate that when lawyers from Mueller’s office appeared in federal court in Alexandria earlier this year, they did so not only as representatives of Mueller’s office but as special assistant United States attorneys (SAUSAs) attached to the United States attorney’s office there.

That designation gives the Mueller prosecutors a kind of dual status that could complicate any attempt by U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III to try to shift the case to federal prosecutors based in Alexandria — a possibility the judge mentioned on a couple of occasions during a contentious hearing earlier this month.

A spokesman for Mueller’s office, Peter Carr, confirmed to POLITICO that some of the attorneys on the special counsel’s team have the SAUSA status. Carr pointed to a local federal court rule that allows federal prosecutors to handle cases there when “appearing pursuant to the authority of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.”

One lawyer who has studied the use of SAUSAs said the granting of that status to lawyers on Mueller’s team theoretically gives them the authority to pursue matters that aren’t within the special counsel’s mandate.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2018/05/21/mueller-virginia-case-special-assistant-us-attorneys-600777


39 posted on 05/23/2018 3:23:10 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter; Cboldt
One lawyer who has studied the use of SAUSAs said the granting of that status to lawyers on Mueller’s team theoretically gives them the authority to pursue matters that aren’t within the special counsel’s mandate.

Diabolical.

40 posted on 05/23/2018 5:32:31 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson