Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post or notify me by Freepmail.
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post or notify me by Freepmail.
Progressives refuse to discuss this and many other matters in rational discourse. They do so because they know they can not win the argument. Their position is not rational. It is not reasonable.
Liberal beliefs are political dogmatics. They are by any clear understand religious zealots demanding the supremacy of progressivism/globalism/statism/socialism/environmentalism/ et al as absolute truth.
This is precisely what makes it possible for progressives to claim that global warming is “settled science.” The very idea, of course, runs counter to the foundation of science as a methodology. Nothing in science is settled nor can it be lest it stop being science and become, instead, dogma.
Liberalism in the US is dogmatic. It demands acceptance or death.