The actual goal of Sessions Inaction is to deliberately EXASPERATE the Trump-voting public:
That Trump (somehow) BENEFITS from this public expasperation.
You are saying this..?
The "bad cop" as I understand the role not only ruthlessly attends to all crimes seen but even convinces or attempts to convince suspects that he DOES see crime in places where he does not or does not yet.
So you're a great guy but...our holds on the good cop/bad cop rigmarole differ.
But we are exactly the same in our baffling lack of comprehension in the face of deep Sessions Inaction.
My theory is that this expensive and gargantuine surveillance state "has something" on nearly all decision makers. And when someone doesn't act in exactly the way this fell entity prefers, then the long-catalogued dirt is trundled out and the impending bad behavior corrected; thus Justic Roberts famous rulings (gay marriage & Obamacare), as just one tiny example. And that we are, by effect, a secretly occupied country, with what we SEE as the American political process a TOTAL MIRAGE.
Trump makes it crystal clear he is disgusted with Sessions and would never have appointed him if he knew the future.
Mark Levin makes it clear he is deeply disappointed with his friend of 30 yrs, and has publicly called for Sessions to RESIGN.
Sessions is not looked upon as worth firing given what firing him would unleash.
I think both Trump and Levin think it is not a smart thing to do, to fire Sessions.
I don’t think he remains in the job because either man is too fearful of his firing. They have the guts, they just think that there’s a smarter way to go.
I blame Sessions. If he has so messed up, it’s on him. Sure, Trump can fire him. He wants Sessions to go, without firing him. Or stay, if the man hasn’t the right stuff to do his job or quit.
Sessions = worthless.