Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doorgunner69
Now, the smoking gun is an e-mail between FBI agent Strzok, Peter Strzok and his mistress slash FBI lawyer Lisa Page. That e-mail was not released before, even though Congress asked for it, held back by the FBI. That e-mail is a smoking gun. Why? And I'm going to read you the e-mail in a moment, because Peter Strzok was the top investigator into the Hillary Clinton e-mail situation, he answered to McCabe the assistant FBI chief and James Comey the FBI director. So he was like third guy and he was involved directly in the Hillary Clinton situation and then in the Trump Russian collusion investigation. So this guy, Peter Strzok, is a major player, he's still at the FBI. Page is out of there. All right. Let's put the e-mail on the screen, Lisa Page the mistress to Strzok, asks “Trump is not ever going to become president. Right? Right?!” Peter Struck, “No. No he won't. We'll stop it.”

IMO, overall it's just looking like a whitewash.

But worth reading the full transcript at the link.

11 posted on 06/16/2018 10:01:37 PM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: texas booster

Well... it’s interesting. The summary and conclusions are clearly a complete whitewash.

But the body of the report tells a completely different story - so different, that I cannot believe the summary and conclusions were authored by the same hand.

I think we should suspect that the summary and conclusions are the work of Rosenstein and not the IG.


28 posted on 06/17/2018 12:15:54 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: texas booster

Whore-o-witch’s opinions about the evidence should not be taken with very much weight at all.

The evidence itself is what matters and there may be more than what Whore-o puts forth, due to his inherently limited scope of inquiry.

The salient point is that the evidence needs to be taken up by someone with the proper authority to go wherever the fullness of the evidence leads, to be placed before a grand jury for possible criminal indictments.


34 posted on 06/17/2018 3:27:23 AM PDT by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson