Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

This is going to be a hard decision.

In past, federal judges have thrown out race neutral maps, because it diluted the minority vote; but they have also thrown out maps that guaranteed minority representation in some districts, because it was argued that had they been race neutral, minorities *might* have picked up seats in other districts.

Yep, the SCOTUS is going to earn its beer with this one.


15 posted on 06/17/2018 6:25:57 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Gerrymandering is named for Elbridge Gerry, one of the Founding Fathers, a Signer of the Declaration of Independence.

He was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, so his invention should be constitutional. On the other hand, he did not sign the Constitution when it was completed. So maybe his support doesn't make it constitutional.

19 posted on 06/17/2018 7:21:39 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson